How Does a Stone's Motion from a Cliff Illustrate Basic Physics Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Physics
AI Thread Summary
A stone thrown upward from a 65 m high cliff reaches a maximum height before descending, illustrating basic physics concepts. At the highest point, the acceleration is -9.8 m/s², and the velocity is 0 m/s. The total displacement during the free fall is calculated to be 70.1 m, accounting for the stone's ascent and descent. The time in free fall can be derived from kinematic equations, leading to the final velocity upon impact. Additionally, a car accelerating to 30 m/s in 10 seconds and maintaining that speed for another 10 seconds covers a total displacement of 450 m.
bard
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
A stone is thrown vertically upward with a speed of 10 m/s from the edge of the cliff 65 m high. It reaches the ground sometime later

a) what is the acceleration and velocity at the highest point. (I got acceleration=9.8 m/s^2 and velocity=o)

b)What is the displacement for the freefall portion of the trip? (I got 0 m)

c) what is the final free fall velocity?

d) how long is the stone in freefall?

2)A car starts from rest and accelerates uniformily to a speed of 30 m/s in 10s. The driver maintains this speed for another 10s.

What is the displacement for the entire 20s trip?



Thanx a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, as the stone is thrown upwards, it is decelerating due to the acceleration due to gravity (g). Eventually, the velocity will reach zero at which time it begins the decent back to earth, again due to gravity. Therefore:

a) You are correct :smile: .Acceleration at the highest point = -9.8 meters per second per second and the velocity is 0.

b)We will assume that the stone falls past the starting point to the bottom of the cliff.

Here we need to determine how far the stone goes up using the kinematic equation: velocity final squared = velocity initial squared + 2ay. We are using y as the variable as the motion is vertical rather than horizontal. Solving for y = (Vfinal^2 - Vinitial^2) / 2g. I calculate about +5.1 meters from the top of the cliff. +5.1 meters + 65 meters (the initial starting heighth) = 70.1 meters (the total length of the free fall to the ground).

c) Now that y has been determined, a second equation of y= (gt^2)/2 will give you the time. Note: the actual equation is y = Vinitial * t + (gt^2)/2, but Vinitial is = to zero. Solving for t will yield the time for the free fall. Vfinal = Vinitial + at will give you your final velocity.

d) See above for time in freefall.


2) For problem two we need to divide the trip it into its components. The first 10 sec will be 1 and the second 10 seconds will be 2.

x1:
x1 = average velocity1 * t1 = (Vfinal1 - Vinitial1)t1/2. Plugging in the values results in (30m/s - 0m/s)*10s/2 = 150 meters.

x2:

For this segment the velocity remains constant; therefore we can just multiply the velocity by the time to get the total distance for the second segment (300 m).

x1 + x2 = total displacement = 450m
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top