How Does Air Transmit or Hold a Charge in Electrostatic Devices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylaron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Charge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on how air interacts with charge in electrostatic devices, particularly Leyden jars. Participants explore the mechanisms of charge transmission and storage, as well as the role of air and other materials involved in these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Tay suggests that air can hold or transmit a charge in electrostatic devices, particularly in Leyden jars, and requests an analysis at the atomic and molecular level.
  • One participant argues that air does not hold a charge and that the charge is stored in the metal foil of the Leyden jar, with the air playing no significant role.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about how charge is transmitted through air to the foil, acknowledging that air can become conductive at high voltages but questioning whether it is ionized in typical scenarios.
  • There is a discussion about whether a metal rod touches the plates of the Leyden jar or merely enters the chamber, with implications for how charge might flow through the air.
  • One participant clarifies that Leyden jars consist of dielectric materials with conductive coatings and that charge is stored on the surfaces of these coatings, not in the air.
  • Another participant mentions that air can hold charge in clouds, suggesting that environmental factors like wind may play a role.
  • There is a mention of dust particles in the air potentially contributing to charge holding and cloud formation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of air in charge storage and transmission. While some assert that air does not hold charge, others propose that it can under certain conditions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various assumptions about the behavior of air under different voltage conditions and the physical structure of Leyden jars, but these assumptions are not fully explored or agreed upon.

taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
In various electrostatic devices, static electricity is 'stored' in encapsulated containers of air with a simple conductor penetrating the wall. these Leyden Jars have a metal sheathing on the outside of the container I believe.

If the electrons pass from the conductor through the air to the metal sheathing, doesn't the air hold or transmit a charge?
Is it the ionization of certain gas particles in the air that causes them to hold charge?
I would appreciate an in-depth analysis of this phenomenon at the atomic and molecular scale.

Regards,
-Tay
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Air can conduct electricity when the voltage is high enough but it doesn't hold a charge.
A layden jar consists of a container - e.g. a jar or a bottle - with metal foil on the inside and on the outside. The metal foil is not penetrating the walls.
The charge is stored in the metal foil. The glass or plastic walls of the container insulate the two metal foils from each other. The air inside the jar doesn't play any role whatsoever.
So there is negative charge on one metal foil and positive charge on the other.
The proximity of the negative and positive charges causes them to mostly cancel each other from the point of view of a static generator connected to the jar. That means that you can put a relatively large amount of charge into there before the electric forces repel additional electrons too much to charge the jar any further.
 
Thanks Dr. Zoidberg (I never thought I would say that...)
Oh, I understand now. I'm confused on how the charge is transmitted through the air to the foil though. At a high enough voltage, yes, the air particles would ionize and they would be conductive, but I'm pretty sure the air isn't ionized at this point. Correct?
 
taylaron said:
Thanks Dr. Zoidberg (I never thought I would say that...)
Oh, I understand now. I'm confused on how the charge is transmitted through the air to the foil though. At a high enough voltage, yes, the air particles would ionize and they would be conductive,

Usually the charge is transmitted to the foil by a wire or a metal rod.
In electrostatic machines there is also often charge flowing through the air.

but I'm pretty sure the air isn't ionized at this point. Correct?

At what point? I don't get what you mean.
 
I wasn't aware of a metal rod actually touching the plates. I thought there was a rod entering the chamber, but not touching anything but the air. If that is correct, then the charge would have to flow through the air to the metal plates like you said.

"At what point?" I'm referring to the electrical connection (the air) between the metal rod and the foil wherever it may be in the air.
 
Leyden jars are made of a dielectric material, with conductive coatings inside and out. The interior coating is in contact with a rod that penetrates through the stopper at the top of the jay, often with the aid of a metal chain that dangles from the rod and lies on the interior coating. Charge is not stored in the air, nor in the dielectric of the jar, but on the surfaces of the coatings. The Leyden jar eventually was supplanted by capacitors, which have become smaller and more efficient over time.
 
Ok, thanks for correcting my understanding.
 
taylaron said:
Ok, thanks for correcting my understanding.
You're welcome. The dielectric material separating the cylindrical plates was a matter of practicality and consistency. The real variables come from the thickness of the plate materials, and the size of the gap separating them. You could store charges on those plates even if the dielectric material was replaced by vacuum, though obviously lining a glass jar with thin metallic foil inside and out was a very practical solution.
 
The air can hold charge as it does in clouds with help of the wind.
 
  • #10
I thought dust particles in the air were attributed to the holding of charge and formation of clouds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K