How does altitude affect the speed of sound and the creation of sonic booms?

AI Thread Summary
Altitude significantly affects the speed of sound, primarily due to temperature changes rather than air pressure. At 50,000 feet, the speed of sound is approximately 87% of its value at sea level, meaning it is slower at higher altitudes. This is often misunderstood; while air density decreases with altitude, the critical factor is the lower temperature, which reduces the speed of sound. Consequently, achieving Mach speed requires a higher velocity at lower altitudes compared to higher altitudes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for comprehending sonic booms and their formation.
samsam18200
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Correct me if I'm wrong I'm only 15. But doesn't air pressure affect the speed at which is needed to make a crack/boom. If so it would be easier at 50k feet to go faster, but you would not created a cone until you reach a higher speed. And vice versa with say. 5k feet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mach speed do indeed vary with altitude. In the standard atmosphere [1], mach speed at 50k feet altitude is around 87% of the sea level value, i.e. the speed of sound is slower and not faster at 50k.

For further information I recommend you search for "mach speed at altitude" which should give you references like speed of sound at wikipedia [2] and tables of mach speed [3].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Atmosphere
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
[3] http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/atmosphere/q0112.shtml
 
Filip Larsen said:
Mach speed do indeed vary with altitude. In the standard atmosphere [1], mach speed at 50k feet altitude is around 87% of the sea level value, i.e. the speed of sound is slower and not faster at 50k.

For further information I recommend you search for "mach speed at altitude" which should give you references like speed of sound at wikipedia [2] and tables of mach speed [3].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Atmosphere
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
[3] http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/atmosphere/q0112.shtml
Thank you!
 
Note that most factors tend to roll-up into one: temperature. Since a shock wave is air molecules bouncing off each other, their speed depends on temperature. At higher altitude, pressure is lower, but then so is temperature. The wiki link explains it and includes a graph showing it.
 
Filip Larsen said:
Mach speed do indeed vary with altitude. In the standard atmosphere [1], mach speed at 50k feet altitude is around 87% of the sea level value, i.e. the speed of sound is slower and not faster at 50k.

For further information I recommend you search for "mach speed at altitude" which should give you references like speed of sound at wikipedia [2] and tables of mach speed [3].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Atmosphere
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
[3] http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/atmosphere/q0112.shtml

While true, this is commonly misunderstood. Many people think that the speed of sound is slower due to the lower density of the air at altitude, and this is incorrect. In reality, as russ said, the only really significant factor is temperature. The speed of sound scales as the square root of the temperature, and since it is colder at high altitudes, the speed of sound is correspondingly lower.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top