How Does Amplitude Influence the Oscillation Period of a Cantilever?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the amplitude of a cantilever affects its oscillation period, specifically using the formula T= 2pi* sqrt ((4ML^3)/(Ebd^3)). It raises the question of whether changes in amplitude influence the time period of oscillation. Participants suggest that to maintain a consistent time period, the amplitude should not vary significantly during the experiment. To initiate motion, it's recommended to "twang" the cantilever rather than simply letting the mass drop, allowing for controlled variations in amplitude. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent amplitude for accurate measurements in the experiment.
singh246
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1) Does the amplitude of a cantilever affect the time period of each oscillation when the experiment is set up like http://www.practicalphysics.org/go/Experiment_430.html

2) Please explain your answer.

3) The equation I am using is T= 2pi* sqrt ((4ML^3)/(Ebd^3)). Now this equation works out the time period of the vibrations, but if the time period is changing what does this equation work out?

4) I am planning to set up the experiment as shown in the link, but how would I set the cantilever into motion in order to make the formula work. Do I just let the mass at the end of the cantilever drop?

Any extra information is much appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

singh246 said:
3) The equation I am using is T= 2pi* sqrt ((4ML^3)/(Ebd^3)). Now this equation works out the time period of the vibrations, but if the time period is changing what does this equation work out?

Hi singh246! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Don't do it long enough for the time period to change! :smile:
4) I am planning to set up the experiment as shown in the link, but how would I set the cantilever into motion in order to make the formula work. Do I just let the mass at the end of the cantilever drop?

Just sellotape it on, and then, as the link says, "twang" it!. :smile:

(Twang it different amounts to get different amplitudes.)

It's not rocket science …

no special twanging training needed! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top