How Does Blackbody Radiation Affect Motion in Different Inertial Frames?

AI Thread Summary
A moving spherical black body at temperature T emits radiation isotropically in its rest frame, but in the medium's rest frame, the emission is blue-shifted in the direction of motion and red-shifted in the opposite direction. This results in a net forward emission of energy, leading to a deduction of a net impulse acting to slow the sphere down. The impulse arises from the difference in photon momentum due to Doppler shifting, with the stationary observer noting that more energy is emitted forward than backward. Additionally, radiation from other bodies at a lower temperature, which is red-shifted in the black body's frame, contributes to this slowing effect. The discussion highlights the complexities of radiation effects in different inertial frames and their implications for motion.
mikeph
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
18
I just confused myself with this idea, need someone to fix it please!

Say a spherical black body temperature T is moving with velocity v in some direction through some medium with a lower temperature. In the sphere's rest frame this emission is isotropic, however, in the rest frame of the medium, the net emission is blue-shifted in the direction of the sphere's motion and redshifted in the opposite direction. The observer then deduces the blackbody is not emitting isotropically, with more energy being emitted forward than backwards.

eg. for every photon emitted forward with momentum hf1 there will be one emitted backwards with momentum hf2, where f1>f2 due to the relative Doppler shifting. The stationary observer should then deduce there is a net impulse on the sphere acting to slow it down.

Where does this impulse come from, and where is its Newton's-3rd-law pair?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very nice question with an interesting answer.
The momentum of the sphere decreases in the same rate as its mass - as it loses energy, it gets lighter. The velocity stays the same.
 
I agree with mfb regarding the effect of the body's own radiation. But there is also the radiation due to other bodies at the lower temperature. This will be red-shifted in the frame of the body and should slow down the body to rest.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top