How Does Bow Wave Angle Correlate with Boat Speed on a Catamaran?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between bow wave angle and boat speed in catamarans, particularly in the 10 to 20 knots range. It explores the concept of maximum speed associated with specific hull designs, such as the Hobie 16, which lacks a centerboard and relies on hydrodynamic lift for stability. Theoretical calculations for determining boat speed based on wave speed and angle are presented, alongside the suggestion of using empirical data for accuracy. The importance of factors like water depth, wave frequency, and environmental conditions is emphasized for reliable measurements. Overall, the conversation highlights the potential for applying scientific principles to improve sailing tactics.
YellowPeril
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi

From this post you will deduce that one of my hobbies is sailing, I believe that applying a bit of science to the situation will improve my ability to make better tactical decisions on the spot.

I have a GPS but am interested in getting a quick visual of boat speed related to the angle that the bow wave makes to the boat. Is there a simple relation between bow wave angle and boat speed? The type of hull that I am interested is a catamaran hull (long and thin) so it can never plane and the speed range I am interested in is about from 10 to 20 knots (~20 km/h to 40 km/h)

Also I have heard in conversation that there is a maximum speed associated with a specific type of hull. (Hobie 16 catamaran for example) I would like to understand how this is determined, if it is at all possible. A hobie 16 hull does not have a centerboard like most hulls but is designed with an aerofoil shape. When one hull is flying (term used when one hull is raisd above the waterline), the other hull is in the water and the lift generates the stabalising influence (through hydrodynamic lift) that would normally be generated by a keel on a monohull. The hobie hull can be approximated by a long thin aerofoil dragged through the water in section. I think that there is a penalty incurred in the speed for this type of design, once again heard from somewhere. I would be interested to know what the lift and drag relations would be in relation to hull speed and how to determine them.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For a given wavelength, wave speed varies with water depth. So you'd have to know the water depth and you'd have to be able to detect at least one single frequency. More would add to your accuracy. This is certainly doable but it would probably take some fairly fancy image processing software. Once you know the spectrum (or at least one main frequency), angle, and water depth (assuming it doesn't vary much or your software knows the variations and accounts for them), then you could make a calculation for each wavelength speed using the equations in this wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_surface_wave#Science_of_waves

Then use trigonometry to figure boat speed (probably averaging multiple frequencies to add accuracy). I suppose in theory you might even see a hull signature in the spectrum and angles!

Its an interesting idea, but I think it would be hard to implement in practice.
 
Dang, I skimmed your post and thought you wanted to figure the speed of some distant boat! Ok -- watching your own wake makes it easier, and let's assume its nice deep water (much deeper compared to any wavelength you watch). In that case, pick a wavelength (preferably one much shorter than current water depth), calculate its speed from the simplified equation:

WaveSpeed = 1.25\sqrt{Wavelength}

(meters and seconds)

Then use this equation to calculate boat speed:

BoatSpeed = WaveSpeed * tan(\pi/2 - Angle)

Where Angle is the angle from the boat's path, in radians.

OK, that's the theory. However, I would seriously consider taking empirical data and recording it in a table of angle vs. speed! That way certain other unknowns are accounted for (like inaccuracies/distortions in your visual cortex, inaccuracy in recognizing a wavelength, shock waves, water makeup and temperature, etc.). Come to think of it, salt content would change things a lot, I think.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Fleem,

Empirical measurements were what I had in mind. I just needed some background on the variables to see if it would be a worthwhile excercise. From what you have told me it could be worth the effort to make some crude measurements with the GPS while out on the water. Bearing in mind to repeat the excercise in different conditions, I should be able to get what I am after.
 
fleem said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/22/2294452-1.png
[/URL]

Alternatively,

Vboat = Vwave / tan(θ)​
is a somewhat more direct calculation (no need to subtract θ from π/2 or 90°)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top