How Does Bullet Speed Change After Hitting a Pendulum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zaddyzad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Pendulum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bullet colliding with a pendulum. The original poster presents a scenario where a bullet passes through a pendulum, and participants explore the implications of energy and momentum conservation in this inelastic collision context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy and momentum to analyze the collision, questioning the validity of energy conservation due to the inelastic nature of the collision.
  • Some participants attempt to calculate the height the pendulum reaches after the collision to find its velocity, while others express confusion about the relationship between the bullet's and pendulum's kinetic energies.
  • There are inquiries about the correct application of momentum equations and the implications of the bullet not remaining in the pendulum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest using both energy and momentum principles, while others emphasize the need to treat the bullet and pendulum as separate entities post-collision. There is a recognition that energy is not conserved during the collision itself, but may be conserved in the system afterward.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of inelastic collisions, questioning assumptions about energy conservation, and discussing the specific conditions of the problem, such as the bullet passing through the pendulum rather than sticking to it.

zaddyzad
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 10g bullet moving at 300.m/s hits and passes through a 2.20kg pendulum target. After the impact, the 1.20m long pendulum rises up to an angle of 15 degree, find the final speed of the bullet.

Homework Equations


Ek= 1/2MV^2
Ep= MGH
Momentum = MV

The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed all energy before and after the question will be = because the collision is inelastic, both masses don't stay together. I found the height the pendulum rises by doing 1.2-(1.2Cos15). Then I put everything i knew in EK= Ep + EK

(300^2)*(0.01)*(0.5) = (2.20)(9.8)(0.04) + (0.5)(0.01)(v')^2

When I solve for velocity I get the answer wrong. What am I doing wrong, am I wrong that energy is conserved ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why are you using 300^2 ? use conservation of linear momentum to get the relationship between the initial and final velocities of the bullet.
 
I tried solving via energy.
 
Though when I try solving momentum i get. 300(0.01)=2.2(v)+0.01(v) 2 variables.
 
well you need BOTH energy and momentum to solve this... since bullet gets stuck inside the pendulum, this is an inelastic collision and kinetic energy is not conserved...
 
Though the bullet leaves the pendulum, do we still consider this inelastic ?
 
oh sorry. didn't read the question properly. let me think
 
Conservation of momentum works regardless of the nature of the collision. The trick here is to figure out how much momentum ended up in the pendulum bob...
 
well. the collision is still inelastic. use the conservation of energy to get the velocity of the
pendulum immediately after the collision. then use conservation of linear momentum to connect all three velocities
 
  • #10
this doesn't work.
 
  • #11
And if the collision is still inelastic you can't "use the conservation of energy to get the velocity of the pendulum immediately after the collision" because in a inelastic collision EK is not conserved.
 
  • #12
zaddyzad said:
And if the collision is still inelastic you can't "use the conservation of energy to get the velocity of the pendulum immediately after the collision" because in a inelastic collision EK is not conserved.

You were given other information about the pendulum involving its energy...
 
  • #13
Thats why I tried solving by... Ek(bullet) = Ep(pendulum) + EK(bullet)
Why doesn't that work ?
 
  • #14
well, let's say that velocity of the pendulum immediately after the collision is v_2. Now since the gravitational force is conservative, here, the total energy is
conserved and you can use conservation of energy to connect angle with this velocity and find v_2. since the bullet is momentarily inside the pendulum, the KE of the bullet is NOT conserved. but if we take system as bullet + pendulum, then there are no
external forces in x direction. so we can still use conservation of linear momentum.
 
  • #15
Yes I tried that 300(0.01) = 2.21(v'). But what do I do with that velocity.
I tried Ek(pendulum+bullet) = Ek + Ep yet got the wrong answer.
 
  • #16
Is there something wrong with this ?
 
  • #17
zaddyzad said:
Thats why I tried solving by... Ek(bullet) = Ep(pendulum) + EK(bullet)
Why doesn't that work ?

Because energy is not conserved over the collision. Before and after the collision it is, for both objects separately.

Momentum, on the other hand, is always conserved. What do you need to know about the pendulum in order to calculate its momentum immediately after the collision? What information do you have on hand that could tell you?
 
  • #18
zaddyzad said:
Yes I tried that 300(0.01) = 2.21(v'). But what do I do with that velocity.
I tried Ek(pendulum+bullet) = Ek + Ep yet got the wrong answer.

The bullet does not remain in the pendulum, and energy is not conserved over an inelastic collsion. Even so, there is other information available that will allow you to calculate the KE of the pendulum bob immediately after the collision. If you have its KE, what else can you find?
 
  • #19
300(0.01) = 2.21(v'), is that correct for the velocity of the moment the bullet strikes the pendulum? And if it is i can find its KE, which can also lead to finding its height ?
 
  • #20
But I already found its height using trig.
 
  • #21
before the collision, you just have the momentum of the bullet. after the collision, you have the momentum of the bullet plus the momentum of the pendulum (immediately after). so equate the two... you can get the velocity of the pendulum immediately after using the energy conservation for the pendulum ONLY. use that value in the above momentum equation to get the velocity of the bullet after it passes through
 
  • #22
zaddyzad said:
300(0.01) = 2.21(v'), is that correct for the velocity of the moment the bullet strikes the pendulum? And if it is i can find its KE, which can also lead to finding its height ?

No, in this case you should never consider the bullet and pendulum to be one object. It just passes through.

You're holding the wrong end of the stick here :smile: Start with the height that the pendulum reaches and work back to find its initial velocity.
 
  • #23
So, I did Ek(bullet) = Ek(pendulum)<-- found velocity, I used this for the momentum of the pendulum.
then did P(bullet) = P(pendulum) + P(bullet). I didn't get the answer
 
  • #24
AHHH, don't know who to listen to.
 
  • #25
what answers you have got for the problem so far ?
 
  • #26
For gneill. Ek(pendulum) = Ep(pendulum). Correct, and that will give me its intial velocity that turned into its height?
 
  • #27
zaddyzad said:
So, I did Ek(bullet) = Ek(pendulum)<-- found velocity, I used this for the momentum of the pendulum.
That is incorrect. The KE of the bullet is never equal to that of the pendulum. KE is not conserved over the collision. Forget mixing pendulum and bullet KE's.

Use the change in height of the pendulum to find its initial velocity.
 
  • #28
Ek(pendulum) = Ep(pendulum), isn't thzat what i said ?
 
  • #29
zaddyzad said:
For gneill. Ek(pendulum) = Ep(pendulum). Correct, and that will give me its intial velocity that turned into its height?

Yes.
 
  • #30
because with that I am not mixing bullet with the pendulum, and there is a form of energy that did give the pendulum height, and that's its initial velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K