How does C affect molecular magnetism according to Olivier Kahn's book?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter assyrian_77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism Molecular
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the constant C and molecular magnetism as presented in Olivier Kahn's book "Molecular Magnetism." Participants are examining a specific equation related to magnetic susceptibility, χ, and the steps involved in deriving it from a summation of squared magnetic quantum numbers, M_S.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the derivation of the equation χ=C∑_{M_S=-S}^{+S} (M_S^2)/(2S+1) leading to χ=(C/3)S(S+1).
  • Another participant provides the formula for the sum of squares, ∑_{k=1}^n k^2=(1/6)n(n+1)(2n+1), which is relevant to the derivation.
  • A subsequent reply applies the summation formula to the context of the magnetic susceptibility equation, showing the steps to arrive at χ=(C/3)S(S+1).
  • One participant acknowledges their forgetfulness regarding the summation formula and expresses gratitude for the reminder.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the mathematical steps involved in the derivation, with one participant confirming the use of the summation formula. However, the initial confusion about the derivation indicates that not all aspects are fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the summation formula and the assumptions regarding the range of M_S values. There may be limitations in the participants' recollection of mathematical identities that could affect their understanding of the derivation.

assyrian_77
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I am going through Olivier Kahn's book "Molecular Magnetism". I am stuck on something that seems so simple. On page 10, it is stated that

\chi=C\sum_{M_S=-S}^{+S}\frac{{M_S}^2}{2S+1}

The book then states that this leads to

\chi=\frac{C}{3}S(S+1)

I've tried to figure the steps between but I can't get anywhere. What am I missing here?

EDIT: Of course, M_S=-S,-S+1,...,S-1,S




PS. C=\frac{Ng^2\beta^2}{kT} where \beta is the Bohr magneton and k is the Boltzmann constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\sum_{k=1}^n k^2=\frac{1}{6}n(n+1)(2n+1)
 
\chi=C\sum\limits_{M_s=-S}^S \frac{M_S^2}{2S+1}<br /> =C\times 2\times \frac{1}{6} \frac{S(S+1)(2S+1)}{(2S+1)}=\frac{C}{3}S(S+1)
 
snooper007 said:
\sum_{k=1}^n k^2=\frac{1}{6}n(n+1)(2n+1)
Thanks a lot! Of course, I didn't remember that summation at all. It's been a while. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K