How does centripetal force affects the path?

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle moves in a circular path within a magnetic field due to the perpendicular nature of the magnetic force, which alters the particle's direction without changing its speed. The consistent inward force maintains a constant radius, resulting in a perfect circle rather than a spiral. If the force were to vary over time, various paths such as spirals or ellipses could emerge, but with constant force, the path remains circular. This concept is analogous to a car maintaining a circular path when the steering wheel is held steady at a constant speed. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why charged particles exhibit circular motion in magnetic fields.
jaobyccdee
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
When there's magnetic field, a charged particle moves in a circle. I would like to ask why won't the circle goes smaller even when there's a force pointing inward (towards the center of the circle). Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any force that acts perpendicularly to the direction of motion doesn't change a particle's speed, only the direction. And the magnetic force always acts perpendicularly to the direction of motion.
 
So when it changes the direction of the path, why will it become a perfect circle instead of a path that circles around closer and closer to the center? Sorry i don't know the word to describe that path...
 
jaobyccdee said:
So when it changes the direction of the path, why will it become a perfect circle instead of a path that circles around closer and closer to the center?
The word you're looking for is spiral. The reason the path is a circle in this case is because the force (and acceleration) are constant as well as perpendicular to the path (velocity). If the amount of force varies with time, then just about any path would be possible, with the only constraint that speed is constant. The force could be adjusted to create a spiral, an ellipse, a parabola, a hyperbola, a sine wave, ... , any path that is possible with constant speed and only direction changes. For example, think of the possible paths your car could follow while moving at constant speed with just steering inputs, however if you hold the steering wheel in one position, then the car's path will be a circle (or a straight line) (assuming it doesn't slide).
 
Last edited:
Thank you:)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top