How Does Changing the Medium Lower the Activation Barrier?

AI Thread Summary
Changing the medium from water to ethanol can enhance reaction rates by up to 10^6 times, lowering the activation barrier by approximately 9 kcal/mol. The relationship between solvent choice and activation energy can be analyzed using the Arrhenius equation, which connects activation energy to reaction rates. The stabilization of the transition state (TS) by the solvent plays a crucial role; polar solvents can stabilize the TS more than the reactants, affecting the activation energy. Understanding these dynamics requires knowledge of how solvent interactions influence both the reactants and the TS. This discussion emphasizes the importance of solvent effects in chemical kinetics.
greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

It is stated that changing the medium - water to ethanol f.ex - the experimentally measured rate enhancement is 10^6 fold which leads to a lowering of the activation barrier of \approx 9 kcal/mol.
I don't quite understand which parameters I am missing in order to calculate that? Any help on which equations could be used to deduced this would be very much appreciated.

Thanks in advance

best regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you want to calculate - just the relationship between reaction rate and activation energy, or the relationship between solvent and activation energy?

I'm not sure how easily you can calculate the change in activation energy (given a change in solvent), but if you can do that, you can then determine the effect on the rate constant through the Arrhenius equation (and then, the effect on the reaction rate from the rate equation). The latter two equations should be covered in any standard textbook.

The change in activation comes from the difference in stabilization of the reactants and the transition state, by the solvent. For instance, a TS with a greatly increased charge density (compared to the reactant) will experience much larger charge-dipole interactions with a polar medium. A polar solvent thus stabilizes the TS more than the reactant and, as a result, increases the activation energy for the forward reaction.
 
To add to what Gokul stated:

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JCPSA6000084000009004894000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top