How Does Charge Density Affect Electric Field Calculations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field produced by a uniformly charged nonconducting plastic wire and its circular configuration. The wire has a charge density of 125 nC/m and is 8.00 cm long. The electric field at a point 5.50 cm above the midpoint of the straight wire is calculated using the formula E = ρ/2πεor, yielding a value of approximately 4.0871 x 10^4 N/C. When the wire is bent into a circle, the electric field at the same height is calculated using a different approach, resulting in an electric field of approximately 2.97 x 10^4 N/C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge density
  • Familiarity with cylindrical-polar coordinates
  • Knowledge of integration techniques for summing contributions
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of cylindrical coordinates in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of vector summation in electric field calculations
  • Investigate the impact of charge distribution shape on electric field strength
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to understand electric field calculations from charged objects.

Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A straight, nonconducting plastic wire 8.00 cm long carries a charge density of 125 nC/m distributed uniformly along its length. It is lying on a horizontal tabletop.

A) Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field this wire produces at a point 5.50 cm directly above its midpoint.

B) If the wire is now bent into a circle lying flat on the table, find the magnitude and direction of the electric field it produces at a point 5.50 cm directly above its center.

I have tried to figure it out, but I am having some issues.

Homework Equations



theta = r/(L/s)

E = Q/2πrεoL = ρL/2πrL = ρ/2πεor

The Attempt at a Solution



E = 125*10^-9/((2pi(0.055)8.85*10^-12 = 4.0871*10^4

Ey = Esin(theta)

theta = r/(L/s) = arctan(2*0.055)/0.08 =arctan(1.375) = 53.97 degrees

Ey= 4.0871*10^4 * sin53.97 degrees = 3.31*10^4

Alternatively, would I do arctan again for 53.57 degrees for 88.938 degrees? Then multiply it by 4.0871*10^4? The answer would be 4.086*10^4

Is this right?? Please help me.

b)

r= L/2pi = 0.08/2pi = 0.0126 m

d = square root(0.0126^2+0.055^2) = 0.0564 m

Ey = Esin(theta)

theta = arctan(0.055)/(0.0126m) = 77.1 degrees

Ey = PL/4piEor^2 = 125*10^-9 * 0.08 / 4pi(8.85*10^-12(0.055^2) = 2.97*10^4
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is usually easier to think about to put your rod in an explicit coordinate system - I'd suggest along the z axis of cylindrical-polar coordinates with the com of the rod at z=0.

So the rod goes from -4 to 4 cm, and you want the field at point P=(r,θ,z)=(5.5,0,0).

You need to sum the infinitesimal contributions across the length of the rod - like this:E=\int_{z=-4}^{z=4}d\vec{E}
Where dE is contribution to the field at P due to an arbitrary bit of the rod at position Z=(0,0,z), length dz. At that position, for example, Q(z)=ρdz where ρ is the linear charge density. The square distance will be |ZP|2 = (z2+5.52) ... from which you get the magnitude.

Since this will be a vector sum, you need to resolve into components - pick radial and z-axis components. You'll find the sum of the z-axis components will be zero.

I think where you are going wrong, if I read you right, is that you have fixed your theta when it will actually vary with z. Express the sine as a function of z and you'll get there. I've just used theta as a coordinate label so I have to change notation:

If \alpha is the angle between \vec{ZR} and \vec{OZ} [recall O=(0,0,0)] then \int dE\sin\alpha = 0 and \cos\alpha is determined from trigonometry.

Note: it will help you understand if you draw a picture.
 
Last edited:
Alright, thank you very much for the detailed and well-written response. I have a much better idea on what is actually happening.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
10K