How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electrostatic Energy and Potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating electrostatic energy and potential in systems with multiple charges and conducting spheres. The first problem involves four charges at the corners of a square, yielding an electrostatic energy of -4.7 J. The second problem compares the potentials of two conducting spheres, with the smaller sphere at 100V, while the potential of the larger sphere is debated among several options. The third problem involves three connected conducting spheres, where the charge on the large sphere in equilibrium is determined to be 2.0 x 10^-4 C. Participants express confusion over their calculations and the use of combinations in solving these electrostatic problems.
gwenle1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Four charges are placed at the corners of the square where the opp diagonals have +2microcoulombs and -2 coulombs. what is the electrostatic energy of the system? ANS: -4.7 J


2. Two conducting spheres that carry equal charges are very far from each other and from all other charges. One of these spheres has twice the radius of the other one. If the potential of the smaller sphere (relative to infinity) is 100V, the potential of the arger sphere (relative to infinity) is closest to... ANS: 100V, 200V, 50V, 25V, or 400V

3. three conducting spheres of radii 1m, 2m and 3m are connected by wires 50 meters long in a triangle with the angles 60 degrees each. a charge of 4x10^-4 C is initially placed on teh large sphere. determine the charge on teh large sphere in equilibrium. ANS 2.0 x 10^-4






The attempt at a solution
1) I tried using PE = kq1q1/R... found the sides and the diagonals but I got an answer of zero, which is wrong.

2) I found the net energy of both spheres, and then used this energy with the given potential to find the potential of the larger sphere, but i think I am rearranging wrong?

3) i drew a FBD diagram and did horizontal and vertical components on teh larger sphere, but I got a much larger number as my answer.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have 4C2 combinations to consider.
Two of these will be diagonally opposite pairs and all others will be adjacent pairs.
 
I have no idea why you would use combinations for my problems
 
Was just telling you there would be 6 pairs to consider.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top