How Does Damping Force Relate to Velocity in a Pendulum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrm2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping
AI Thread Summary
Damping force in a pendulum is directly proportional to the velocity of vibration, meaning that as the pendulum moves faster, the damping force increases, leading to a quicker reduction in amplitude. The damping coefficient quantifies this relationship, representing the extent to which damping affects the motion; it varies with factors like air resistance, which increases with velocity. As an example, in a car, air resistance grows significantly as speed increases, illustrating the non-linear nature of damping forces. The concept of damping reflects how quickly oscillations diminish, akin to the varying durations of sound decay in a guitar string based on the force applied. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the behavior of oscillatory systems.
jrm2002
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Damping Regarding Damping!

Let us say we have a have mass concentrated at the end of a string(simple pendulum).Let us say the pendlum is set in motion and then eventually due to energy loss through air resistance, the amplitude of the oscillation will reduce and eventually the pendulum comes to rest.

These damping forces are taken in problems as:

Damping force=(Damping Coefficient) x velocity of vibration

My questions are:
1. how is the damping force proportional to velocity of vibration?
2. What is this damping coefficient?What does the damping coefficient physically denote??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-1- That's an approximation -- for example, what can you say about air resistance and velocity? What happens to air resistance as you go faster in a car?

-2- Do you have a feeling for what "damping" means? It's how quickly the oscillation is quenched. Think of a guitar string. When you pluck the string, it takes a few seconds to stop oscillating (low damping), right? You can stop that oscillation faster if you grab the string hard (high damping), or you can control the fade of the sound by touching the string lightly (medium damping).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top