MHB How Does Definition 8.9 Imply Differentiability Near Point p?

Click For Summary
Definition 8.9 states that a function is differentiable at point p if it can be approximated by an affine function of the form x → c + Lx. The discussion highlights that if a function F(x) can be approximated near p, there exist constants c and L such that F(x) = c + L(x - p) + ε(x - p), where ε represents the error term that approaches zero as x approaches p. The key point is that the differentiability condition is satisfied if ε(x) decreases faster than x as x approaches p. This leads to the conclusion that the limit defining the derivative exists, confirming differentiability at p. Understanding this relationship between approximation and differentiability is crucial for grasping the concepts in Browder's text.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am currently reading Chapter 8: Differentiable Maps and am specifically focused on Section 8.2 Differentials ...

I need help in fully understanding Browder's comments on Definition 8.9 ... ...

Definition 8.9 including Browder's remarks reads as follows:View attachment 7469
In the above text from Browder, we read the following:

" ... ... We say that $$T \ : \ \mathbb{R}^n \mapsto \mathbb{R}^m$$ is an affine map if it has the form $$x \mapsto c + Lx$$ for some $$c \in \mathbb{R}^m$$ and linear map $$L \ : \ \mathbb{R}^n \mapsto \mathbb{R}^m$$. Thus Definition 8.9 says roughly that a function is differentiable at $$p$$ if it can be approximated near $$p$$ by an affine function. ... ..."I cannot see exactly how Definition 8.9 implies that a function is differentiable at $$p$$ if it can be approximated near $$p$$ by an affine function ... that is a function of the form $$x \mapsto c + Lx$$ ...

Can someone please demonstrate rigorously that Definition 8.9 implies that a function is differentiable at $$p$$ if it can be approximated near $$p$$ by an affine function ... that is a function of the form $$x \mapsto c + Lx$$ ... ?
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a direct calculation. "If function F(x) can be approximated by an affine function near p" then there exist c and L such that F(x)= c+ L(x- p)+ \epsilon(x-p) where \epsilon(x-p) is the "error" in the approximation that goex to 0 as x goes to p (\epsilon(0)= 0).

Then F(p)= c+ \epsilon(0)= c and F(p+ h)= c+ L(h)+ \epsilon(h).
So F(p+ h)- F(p)= Lh+ \epsilon(h)

\frac{1}{|h|}\left(F(x+p)- F(p)- Lh\right)= \frac{1}{|h|}\left(Lh+ \epsilon(h)\right)= L\frac{h}{|h|}+ \frac{\epsilon}{|h|}.

We only need that we can choose \epsilon(x) goes to 0 faster than x.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K