How Does Doubling Capacitance Affect Voltage Distribution in a Series Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ortin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with three equal capacitors (C) and a battery of V volts, the voltage is initially distributed evenly, resulting in V/3 across each capacitor. When the middle capacitor is changed to 2C, the potential difference across it is halved, affecting the overall voltage distribution. The new voltage across the first and third capacitors becomes equal, denoted as V1, while the middle capacitor has a potential difference of V2. The relationship V = 2V1 + V2 holds, indicating that the total voltage remains V. This change in capacitance also impacts the charge per plate, leading to a need for further analysis to resolve any contradictions in voltage and charge calculations.
ortin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Three equal capacitors, all with values C, are in series with a battery of V volts. If the middle capacitor is changed to 2C, what will be the resultant potential across each capicitor? Express your answer in terms of V.



Homework Equations



C = Q / V



The Attempt at a Solution



Initially, when the capacitors are equal, the total voltage will be distrubuted evenly over the capacitors (Kirchhoffs law). Therefore the potential over each = V / 3

If one of the capacitors value is doubled, then following the relation V = Q /C, the potential diffence of the middle capacitor will be halved.

End of attempt

However the next question goes on to discuss the affect of this on the charge per plate. By rearrangement - Q = VC, so if the capacitance is doubled, so should the charge. But then this contradicts the value for V previoulsy found?

Many Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The PEs across each of the capacitors have changed, in such a way that the sum is V. The new PE across 1 and 3 is the same, say V1 (by symmetry). The new PE across the middle one is now V2.

V=2V1+V2.

Suppose C was the capacitance of each at first. The middle one is 2C now.

Now, the charge in the middle one must be equal to the charge of 1st. Using this, what do you get?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top