How Does Electric Field Direction Affect Electron Path in Parallel Plate Setup?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electron being accelerated through a potential difference and entering the gap between two parallel plates with a specified separation and potential difference. The focus is on understanding how the electric field direction affects the electron's path in this setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the electric field direction and the potentials of the plates, questioning how to determine the direction of the electric field. There are inquiries about the integration limits when calculating potential differences and how the orientation of the electric field affects the integration process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying concepts related to electric fields and potential differences. Some have provided insights into the integration process and the significance of the direction of the electric field relative to the integration path. There is a collaborative atmosphere with participants confirming each other's understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of potential differences and electric fields, with some noting the importance of assumptions made in the problem setup. The discussion reflects a focus on understanding rather than reaching a definitive solution.

PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



7. In Fig. 28-35, an electron accelerated from rest through potential difference {V}_{1} = 1.00{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}kV enters the gap between two parallel plates having separation d = 20.0{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}mm and potential difference {V}_{2} = 100{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}V. The lower plate is at the lower potential. Neglect fringing and assume that the electron’s velocity vector is perpendicular to the electric field vector between the plates. In unit-vector notation, what uniform magnetic field allows the electron to travel in a straight line in the gap.

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/4953/platepicgl6.jpg

Homework Equations



<br /> {\vec{E}}_{p1} = {\frac{\vec{F}_{21}}{q_{2}}}<br />

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{p}} = {-}{\int_{r_{0}}^{r_{1}}}{\vec{E}_{p1}(r)}{\cdot}{d{\vec{r}}}<br />

<br /> {\vec{F}_{B}} = q{\vec{v}}{\times}{\vec{B}}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, this problem does not seem that hard, however the wording isn’t really clear. So let me see if I understand this problem, you have an electron being accelerated by {V}_{1} into an electric field produced by two plates. Where the bottom plate has potential {V}_{2}.

Ok, so my question is if the bottom plate has potential {V}_{2}, does the top plate have a potential?

Also, what about the electric field between the two plates how can you tell in what direction the electric field points in?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,

So, I was looking at this problem again and I am still not all that sure about how you can tell which way the electric field points? How is that you determine that in this problem?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
The electric field points from higher to lower potential, which can be seen from this equation of yours (that's the meaning of the minus sign):
PFStudent said:
<br /> {\Delta{V}_{p}} = {-}{\int_{r_{0}}^{r_{1}}}{\vec{E}_{p1}(r)}{\cdot}{d{\vec{r}}}<br />
 
Hey,

I was looking at this problem again and had a quick question. When finding the potential difference,

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{p}} = {-}{\int_{r_{0}}^{r_{1}}}{\vec{E}_{p1}(r)}{\cdot}{d{ \vec{r}}}

Do you always integrate from the lower potential to the higher potential? In other words when finding the Electric field would I integrate from,

<br /> {r_{0}} = {-{\frac{d}{2}}}<br />

to

<br /> {r_{1}} = {+{\frac{d}{2}}}<br />

So, that the integral would look like the following,

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {-}{\int_{{-{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Where, {\theta} = {180}^{o}, since \vec{E} points downward (from the higher potential to the lower potential) and d{\vec{r}} points upward from {r_{0}} to {r_{1}}.

Is that right?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
PFStudent said:
When finding the potential difference,

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{p}} = {-}{\int_{r_{0}}^{r_{1}}}{\vec{E}_{p1}(r)}{\cdot}{d{ \vec{r}}}

Do you always integrate from the lower potential to the higher potential?
Note that you are always finding the potential of r_1 with respect to r_0. If you reverse the integration (integrating from r_1 to r_0) the sign changes:

\int_a^b Fdx = -\int_b^a Fdx

So it doesn't really matter which way you integrate. What does matter is the direction of \vec{E} compared to d\vec{r}.
 
Hey,

Doc Al said:
The electric field points from higher to lower potential, which can be seen from this equation of yours (that's the meaning of the minus sign):

Forgot to say thanks for the above info. That information had helped me better understand how to solve these type of problems. Thanks.

Doc Al said:
Note that you are always finding the potential of r_1 with respect to r_0. If you reverse the integration (integrating from r_1 to r_0) the sign changes:

\int_a^b Fdx = -\int_b^a Fdx

So it doesn't really matter which way you integrate. What does matter is the direction of \vec{E} compared to d\vec{r}.

Ah...yes I do remember that. Thanks for reminding me.

Ok, so then on the below integral,

PFStudent said:
<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {-}{\int_{{-{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Where, {\theta} = {180}^{o}, since \vec{E} points downward (from the higher potential to the lower potential) and d{\vec{r}} points upward from {r_{0}} to {r_{1}}.

Do I have the limits correct?

Doc Al said:
So it doesn't really matter which way you integrate. What does matter is the direction of \vec{E} compared to d\vec{r}.

Ok, so was I correct in performing the integration the way I did, Where {\theta} = {180}^{o}, since \vec{E} points downward (from the higher potential to the lower potential) and d{\vec{r}} points upward from {r_{0}} to {r_{1}}?

Also, since you mentioned that propery of integrals--I could alternatively intregrate the following way,

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {}{\int_{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{-}{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Is the above integral correct also?

So, in the end was the below integral correct?

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {-}{\int_{{-{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Thanks so much for the help,

-PFStudent
 
PFStudent said:
Ok, so then on the below integral,
PFStudent said:
<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {-}{\int_{{-{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Where, {\theta} = {180}^{o}, since \vec{E} points downward (from the higher potential to the lower potential) and d{\vec{r}} points upward from {r_{0}} to {r_{1}}.


Do I have the limits correct?
Yes. You are finding the potential difference of r_1 with respect to r_0.



Ok, so was I correct in performing the integration the way I did, Where {\theta} = {180}^{o}, since \vec{E} points downward (from the higher potential to the lower potential) and d{\vec{r}} points upward from {r_{0}} to {r_{1}}?
Absolutely.

Also, since you mentioned that propery of integrals--I could alternatively intregrate the following way,

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {}{\int_{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{-}{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />

Is the above integral correct also?
Yes indeed.


So, in the end was the below integral correct?

<br /> {\Delta{V}_{2}} = {-}{\int_{{-{\frac{d}{2}}}}^{{{\frac{d}{2}}}}}{|{\vec{E}}_{}(r)|}{}{|d{{\vec{r}}}|}{cos\theta}<br />
You bet.
 
Hey,

Thanks for the help Doc Al! :smile:

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K