How Does Electron Flow Work in a Zn-Cu Electrochemical Cell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chazgurl4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
In a Zn-Cu electrochemical cell, the overall reaction involves the transfer of 2 moles of electrons from zinc to copper. The anode is the zinc side, where oxidation occurs, while copper acts as the cathode, where reduction takes place. Electrons flow from the zinc electrode to the copper electrode, confirming that copper is the oxidizing agent as it gains electrons. The confusion arose from a misunderstanding of the electron flow direction, which is correctly from zinc to copper. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding half-reactions and the reactivity series in electrochemistry.
chazgurl4life
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




2. Consider an electrochemical cell as shown, with Zn in ZnCl2(aq) and Cu in Cu(NO3)2(aq), and a salt bridge containing KNO3(aq). The overall chemical reaction is
Zn(s) + Cu2+(aq)  Zn2+(aq) + Cu(s).

a. How many moles of electrons are transferred in this reaction?
b. Which side is the anode?.
c. Which direction will electrons travel?
d. Which material is being reduced?
e. What is the oxidizing agent?


Homework Equations



a for a i understand that 2 moles of electrons are transferred throught the salt brige. From anode to cathode.for b i said that the left side is the anode and c) that the electrons travel from zinc to copper
for d: o recognize that Cu 2+ is being reduced because it gains 2 electrons and becomes Cu (s). for e i think that since Cu 3+ is rduced it is the oxidizing agent..


The Attempt at a Solution




but my professor says the electrons flow from copper to zinc andthat zinc is the oxidizing agent...can anyone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write the half reactions:Zn \rightarrow Zn^{2+} + 2e^{-}Cu^{2+} + 2e^{-} \rightarrow Cu

The electrons flow from zinc to copper and copper is the oxidizing agent.
 
Last edited:
Google reactivity series.
 
thanx so i guess my prof was wrong thanx
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top