How Does Faraday's Law Explain Induced Current in a Changing Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how to calculate the induced current in a coil subjected to a changing magnetic field, specifically using Faraday's Law. The user poses a problem involving a coil with specific dimensions and resistance, seeking clarification on the formula used to derive the induced current. The formula I = (delta A*B)/(delta t*R) is identified as an application of Faraday's Law, which relates the induced electromotive force (emf) to the change in magnetic flux over time. Additionally, Ohm's Law is referenced to connect voltage and current. The conversation invites further exploration of the derivation of Faraday's Law for a deeper understanding.
pkossak
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the following problem:

You are looking down on a single coil in a constant magnetic field B = 0.9 T which points directly into of the screen. The dimensions of the coil go from a = 6 cm and b = 15 cm, to a* = 20 cm and b* = 19 cm in t=0.028 seconds. If the coil has resistance that remains constant at 1.7 ohms, what would be the magnitude of the induced current in amperes?

Now, I have the answer, and I was told how to get it. I used the formula I = (delta A*B)/(delta t*R)

What I was wondering was if someone could tell me what rule or law this formula came from? I can't figure out how to derive it from any of the formulas given in this chapter. Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an application of Faraday's law which is defined as the negative change is magnetic flux over time mulitplied by the number of turns on a coil and is defined mathematically thus;

emf = -N\frac{\Delta(BA)}{\Delta t}

You will also need Ohm's law;

V = IR

Can you go from here?

-Hoot :smile:

If you need a derivation of Faraday's law, you can do a search on the net or I'm happy to guide you through it here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top