How Does Force Scale with Radius in Orbital Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vitani11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Scale
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about how force scales with radius in orbital motion, participants explore the relationship between the period of a particle in circular orbit and the gravitational force it experiences. The focus is on determining the scaling factors n and p, where T scales as r^n and F as F = a * r^p. There is confusion regarding the proper interpretation of these variables, particularly how they relate to Kepler's third law and the gravitational force, which is known to scale as 1/r^2. Participants emphasize the need to incorporate the dependence of n into the calculations for p, highlighting the importance of understanding circular motion dynamics. The conversation underscores the complexities of orbital mechanics and the necessity of clear mathematical relationships in solving such problems.
Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


a. A particle in circular orbit is experiencing an attractive force F towards its center of the orbit. It its period T scales as rn, where r is the radius of the orbit, how does the force scale with radius r? That is, find p in the relation F = arp, where a is an arbitrary constant.

b. Find n and p corresponding to the circulation motion under gravitational force and verify keplers third law.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved part a. for P and I guess that's apparently not what the question it asking for according to my professor who created this problem. I know how to verify Keplers third law for b., don't really know what n and p are supposed to represent or anything. scaling factors? the exponent for r?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes (p for F and n for T)
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
Okay, but I solved for P. What am I supposed to be doing that is not solving for P even though it says find P?
 
I just get something natural log of F/a with base r equal to P.
 
What did you find and what do you know about the gravitational force ?
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
Found that the lnr(F/a) = P and I know the force falls off as 1/r2. I'm not sure what to do with that information.
 
I plugged in gravitational force for F.. my problem is that I always thought P was 2 because that's just in the equation for gravitational force.
 
The exercise for (a) starts with: ##T## scales as ##r^n## and asks what that yields for p. There should be some dependence on ##n## in that expression. How come you don't have that ? Can you show your steps in detail ?

Then, for (b) you fill in the ##p=2## that you know for gravity and deduct what the value of the corresponding ##n## is.
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
F = arp
F/a = rp
ln(F/a) = pln(r)
p = ln(F/a)/ln(r)
p = lnr(F/a)
 
  • #10
I know that for Force the period is 1/T2 for gravitational force. I mean that doesn't really mean anything but that is the relationship.
 
  • #11
Vitani11 said:
p = lnr(F/a)
No. There is a dependence on ##n## that you are leaving out. You are not using the fact that these orbits are circular.

Vitani11 said:
I know that for Force the period is 1/T2 for gravitational force
No. The period is simply T
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
  • #12
Still don't understand. There is no n in the equation, and I guess I have a massive gap in my knowledge. I guess I'll just not get this one. Thank you anyway and sorry for my stupidity.
 
  • #13
Vitani11 said:
A particle in circular orbit is experiencing an attractive force F towards its center of the orbit
What force is needed to maintain a circular orbit ? Gives you a relationship with ##v##. What provides that force ?

There is also a relationship between ##v## and ##T##. Given that ##T\propto r^n## that helps you to find ##p## in ##F_{\rm grav}\propto r^p##.

The template doesn't have a section "2. Homework Equations " for nothing. Very useful in your case.

Vitani11 said:
Thank you anyway
you're welcome. That's what we're here for.
and sorry for my stupidity.
Don't say that. You're not stupid and even if you were you wouldn't need to apologize for that.
 
Back
Top