How does friction affect snowboarding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
Friction plays a crucial role in snowboarding dynamics, particularly when a snowboarder turns. The coefficient of friction varies in different directions, allowing for smooth sliding in one direction while stopping in another. A snowboarder can turn uphill until they lose momentum, but stopping occurs when they allow the board to slide instead of carving. The angle between the snowboard's orientation and its velocity affects the friction experienced. Understanding these principles can enhance the design of snowboarding simulations and gameplay mechanics.
Mash
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to make a simply model of a snowboarder for a computer game.

I have implemented basic friction, he slows and comes to a stop when the acceleration force is less than the frictional force.

I am now puzzled as how friction changes when the snowboarder turns. As the snowboarder turns 90 degrees on a hill, he comes to a complete stop also, and does not slide down the hill sideways. Why is this? What prevents a snowboarder from snowboarding uphill?

Any help/discussion would be handy

Mash
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The acceleration is just gravity (not the person, hence snowboarders go downhill). The key concept would be that the coefficient of friction is different in orthogonal directions. A ski is deliberately shaped to slide smoothly over snow in one direction, but plough to a stop in the the other.

(This really only belongs in the general physics forum, what's with the double-posting?)
 
Last edited:
A snowboarder can most certainly snowboard uphill in a turn until they run out of momentum. What prevents it when they stop is that they let the board slide instead of biting and carving out the turn.
 
cesiumfrog said:
The acceleration is just gravity (not the person, hence snowboarders go downhill). The key concept would be that the coefficient of friction is different in orthogonal directions. A ski is deliberately shaped to slide smoothly over snow in one direction, but plough to a stop in the the other.

(This really only belongs in the general physics forum, what's with the double-posting?)

Ahhh, so the coefficient changes... that makes things simpler. Oh yes, I thought that it should have been in classical physics (mechanics) after i already posted under general. Sorry bout that.

Would it be fair to say that the coefficient increases as the angle between the acceleration and the direction of the snowboarder increases?
 
russ_watters said:
A snowboarder can most certainly snowboard uphill in a turn until they run out of momentum. What prevents it when they stop is that they let the board slide instead of biting and carving out the turn.

Oh right. Is it possible to do a complete 360 degree turn going up the hill then back down if you had enough speed? Or is there some sort of bound on how far you can travel uphill...
 
Mash said:
Would it be fair to say that the coefficient increases as the angle between the acceleration and the direction of the snowboarder increases?
No. What matters is the angle between the snowboard and its velocity. You would have sliding friction along one axis, and normally static friction along the other (it works like a roller-skate). And actually it seems to be that axis that moves due to board deformation as the person leans, to steer. You know, one could do a snowboarding simulation that begins right from the design (and characterisation) of the board..
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top