How Does Friction Affect the Acceleration of Stacked Blocks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lax1113
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two stacked blocks, where the top block is subjected to a pulling force while resting on a bottom block that is on a frictionless surface. The problem explores the effects of static and kinetic friction on the acceleration of both blocks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the system's mass and the role of static versus kinetic friction in determining the acceleration of the blocks. Questions arise about the purpose of static friction in the context of the problem and whether the bottom block is affected by the top block's motion.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relevance of static friction in the problem, with some participants expressing confusion about its necessity. Others suggest that understanding when to apply static versus kinetic friction is crucial, especially under varying pulling forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for different outcomes based on the magnitude of the pulling force, indicating that the problem's setup may lead to different interpretations of frictional forces at play.

lax1113
Messages
171
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass 20kg sits on top of a block mass 50kg. The coeficent of static friction between the top block and the bottom block is .6, while the kinetic is .4. The bottom block is on a frictionless surface. The top block is pulled with a force of 200N. What is the acceleration of the bottom and top block?



The Attempt at a Solution


I started out making it as a system, so that the system has a mass of 70kg and only 20kg accounts for the friction. So the friction would be 120N while not moving, and 80N after it has began to move. So with that being said, it appears that the top block would have a friction of 6m/s^2 because it would be (200N-80N)/20kg (i am using 10 for g at the moment). But what is the prupose of the static friction? Does the bottom block get pulled by the top block at the rate of static friction? I am not sure why static is in this problem, but my only guess would be for that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lax1113 said:

Homework Statement


A block of mass 20kg sits on top of a block mass 50kg. The coeficent of static friction between the top block and the bottom block is .6, while the kinetic is .4. The bottom block is on a frictionless surface. The top block is pulled with a force of 200N. What is the acceleration of the bottom and top block?



The Attempt at a Solution


I started out making it as a system, so that the system has a mass of 70kg and only 20kg accounts for the friction. So the friction would be 120N while not moving, and 80N after it has began to move. So with that being said, it appears that the top block would have a frictionyou meant acceleration[/color] of 6m/s^2 because it would be (200N-80N)/20kg (i am using 10 for g at the moment). But what is the prupose of the static friction?
if the top block didn't move with respect to the bottom block, then you would have had to use a friction force less than or equal to the max available static friction force. Since you have shown it does move, forget about it.
Does the bottom block get pulled by the top block at the rate of static friction? I am not sure why static is in this problem, but my only guess would be for that.
The top block does get pulled by the friction between the 2 blocks...is it static or kinetic?
 
Hey,
I am sorry i meant acceleration, just wasn't thinking i suppose. It seems to me that the bottom block would still get pulled by kinetic friciton because they are both moving, so the top block is moving away from the bottom block, but then why in the world would there be a static friction in the question?
 
i have a problem like this with an object on top of another...I am trying to go about how to figure out the maximum static friction on the top object before it begins to slide i believe.
 
The whizz,
I am not sure i understand why you are trying to figure this out. I don't know why it would be in the question if it was not intended to be used, but the answer in the back of the book matches the (Fnormal*kinetic mu)/mass. This makes sense to me, but just what doesn't make sense is why information would be supplied in the question that had no relevance.
 
well its a bit different of a question but very similar. I am trying to find the maximum force that can be exerted on the sled before the penguin begins to slide.

And i believe that this is when the static friction is at its max on the top object before becoming kinetic friction.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=269445
 
lax1113 said:
The whizz,
I am not sure i understand why you are trying to figure this out. I don't know why it would be in the question if it was not intended to be used, but the answer in the back of the book matches the (Fnormal*kinetic mu)/mass. This makes sense to me, but just what doesn't make sense is why information would be supplied in the question that had no relevance.
It is relevant because the question wants you to understand when to use kinetic friction and when to use static friction. What if the pulling force was 80N instead of 200N. Or what if the pulling force was only 60N? What would be the accelerations of each block under these scenarios?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K