How Does Gravity Store Arbitrarily Negative Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lapidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
From Greene's pop science book 'The hidden reality', I got this:

What’s vital to realize is that the gravitational field’s energy can be arbitrarily negative. Consider two particles falling toward each other under their mutual
gravitational attraction. Gravity coaxes the particles to approach each other
faster and faster, and as they do, their kinetic energy gets ever more positive.
The gravitational field can supply the particles with such positive energy
because gravity can draw down its own energy reserve, which becomes
arbitrarily negative in the process: the closer the particles approach each other,
the more negative the gravitational energy becomes (equivalently, the more
positive the energy you’d need to inject to overcome the force of gravity and
separate the particles once again). Gravity is thus like a bank that has a
bottomless credit line and so can lend endless amounts of money; the
gravitational field can supply endless amounts of energy because its own
energy can become ever more negative.

Could someone explain that I bit further? Why and how is in the gravitational field an arbitrarily large amount of energy stored?

What about the potential energy of the two approaching particles, does it not decrease, while the kinetic energy increases?

Greene says this arbitrary gravitational energy supplied the early universe the necessary energy to inflationary expand. How?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the kinetic energy increases, potential energy decreases.
Since it starts out at zero, then potential energy goes negative. This is what he's talking about.

Classically: if two point masses can get arbitrarily close to each other then the energy gets arbitrarily negative. Usually real objects hit each other's surface before that happens.

This is because gravitational potential energy is the work done to separate masses by infinite distance.

One of the puzzles of the formation of the Universe is where all this matter came from - it cannot come from nothing and each gram accounts for a great deal of rest-mass-energy.

One of the arguments is that when you get matter you also get gravity and thus gravitational potential energy. The energy of matter is positive and the energy of gravity is negative - sum them up to get zero. So everything can come from nothing!

But you should be careful of pop-science descriptions - the authors tend to like to blow your mind at the expense of being accurate. It's supposed to be for stimulating your mind but not for drawing conclusions.
 
Simon Bridge said:
As the kinetic energy increases, potential energy decreases.

I see, thanks
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top