How Does Height Affect Weight in a Hypothetical Mile-High Building?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dominus96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the change in weight when ascending a hypothetical mile-high building, based on Frank Lloyd Wright's 1956 proposal. The initial weight at street level is given as 520 N, and the calculation involves using gravitational equations to determine the change in gravitational force at the building's top. A common mistake highlighted is the unnecessary inclusion of Earth's mass and the gravitational constant, as the focus should be on the fractional change in gravitational acceleration relative to the Earth's radius. The correct approach emphasizes that the change in weight is derived from the change in distance to the Earth's center, rather than direct calculations involving mass. Accurate calculations are crucial to avoid significant errors in determining the weight change.
dominus96
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In 1956, Frank Lloyd Wright proposed the construction of a mile-high building in Chicago. Suppose the building had been constructed. Ignoring Earth's rotation, find the change in your weight if you were to ride an elevator from the street level, where you weigh 520 N, to the top of the building.

Homework Equations



a = Gm/R^2

The Attempt at a Solution



g = Gm/R^2, so I used 6.67E-11 for G, the mass of the Earth (5.97E24) for m, and the radius of the Earth plus the distance from Earth's surface (1 mile, which is about 1609 meters) for R. I calculated all that and got about 9.77 for g and then found weight and subtracted it from 520, but it was wrong. What's the deal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the mass of the Earth, nor the value of G: the fractional change in g (which gives you the fractional change in weight) equals the fractional change in 1/r^2, with r the distance to the center of Earth (so, that number you do need).

The fractional change in g that you get is way too large (rounding errors?).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top