How Does Invertibility Affect the Determinant in Matrix Operations?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that for square matrices A and B, where B is invertible, the determinant of the product BAB^-1 equals the determinant of A. The key theorem utilized is that the determinant of the product of two matrices equals the product of their determinants. The proof involves simplifying the expression det(BAB^-1) to det(B)det(A)det(B^-1), which can be further simplified using the property that det(B)det(B^-1) equals 1. This leads to the conclusion that det(BAB^-1) simplifies to det(A), confirming the original statement. The relationship between the determinants of a matrix and its inverse is also highlighted, reinforcing the understanding of matrix operations and their determinants.
RWalden21
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A and B be square matrices, with B invertible. Show that det(BAB^-1) = det(A)


Homework Equations



I think its based off the theorem: If A and B are nxn matrices, then det(AB)= det(A)det(B)

The Attempt at a Solution




I started by simplifying BAB^-1det(A) to just try to get det(A) but I'm just not sure how to do the proof.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Right so how you would expand de(BAB-1) ? And how does det(B) relate to det(B-1)?
 
I suppose you can expand by det(B)det(A)det(B^-1) but I don't know how det(B) relates to det(B^-1). What I was thinking was by expanding and somehow getting B and B^-1 to = I somehow det(A) would remain
 
RWalden21 said:
I suppose you can expand by det(B)det(A)det(B^-1) but I don't know how det(B) relates to det(B^-1). What I was thinking was by expanding and somehow getting B and B^-1 to = I somehow det(A) would remain

Hint: B-1B= I so if you find then the determinant of I should be the same as the determinant of B-1B right?
 
is this correct?

det(BAB^-1)= det(B)det(A)det(B^-1)= det(BB^-1)det(A)= det(I)det(A)= det(A)

det(I) = 1
 
RWalden21 said:
is this correct?

det(BAB^-1)= det(B)det(A)det(B^-1)= det(BB^-1)det(A)= det(I)det(A)= det(A)

det(I) = 1

Yep, that will work. So now you know that det(B-1) = 1/det(B), which may help you somewhere down the road.
 
RWalden21 said:

Homework Statement



Let A and B be square matrices, with B invertible. Show that det(BAB^-1) = det(A)

Homework Equations



I think its based off the theorem: If A and B are nxn matrices, then det(AB)= det(A)det(B)

The Attempt at a Solution

I started by simplifying BAB^-1det(A) to just try to get det(A) but I'm just not sure how to do the proof.

Didn't you realize you've like already done the proof? You know that if ##\mathbf A,\;\mathbf B\in\mathbb R##, then ##\det\mathbf{AB}=\det\mathbf A\det\mathbf B## and ##\det\left(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\right)=\det\left(\mathbf{A}\right)^{-1}##. So if you just simplify ##\det\left(\mathbf{BAB^{-1}}\right)##, what do you get?

Edit: Why is the ##\LaTeX## equation not rendering?
Edit2: Ok, now it renders. I just realized there is an even simpler method though. You could just break up the determinant into three parts and the join two of them and you are done.
 
Last edited:
dimension10 said:
Didn't you realize you've like already done the proof? You know that if ##\mathbf A,\;\mathbf B\in\mathbb R##
A and B aren't real numbers; they're matrices.
dimension10 said:
, then ##\det\mathbf{AB}=\det\mathbf A\det\mathbf B## and ##\det\left(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\right)=\det\left(\mathbf{A}\right)^{-1}##. So if you just simplify ##\det\left(\mathbf{BAB^{-1}}\right)##, what do you get?
 
Mark44 said:
A and B aren't real numbers; they're matrices.

Sorry, I meant ##\mathbf{A},\;\mathbf{B}\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}##
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K