How Does Latitude Affect Observed Gravity?

physics_lover
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
G.JPG

When an observer stand on at the place with a angle "a" of the latitude,
the observed value of the gravity will be affected by the motion of the rotation.SO what is the value of the obversed gravity at that time?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of gravity is counteracted by the centrifugal force so the observed value of gravity is less than the true value. The effect due to the ficticious centrifugal or centripetal force (however you choose to name it) is as follows.

\mathbf{F}_c = m(\mathbf{\omega} \times (\mathbf{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}))

Where \mathbf{\omega} and \mathbf{r} are the angular velocity and radius of the Earth respectively.
 
Last edited:
thz very much, the obversed gravity g' is less than ture value of g =10ms^-2 .
But I can't find the equation of g' in term of g & "angle of a" & "r"
& angluar velocity W only,

help me again pls!
 
You need to resolve the centripetal acceleration into horizontal and vertical components (think about what would be the best definition of horizontal and vertical in this case).
 


Kurdt said:
The force of gravity is counteracted by the centrifugal force so the observed value of gravity is less than the true value. The effect due to the ficticious centrifugal or centripetal force (however you choose to name it) is as follows.

\mathbf{F}_c = m(\mathbf{\omega} \times (\mathbf{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}))

Where \mathbf{\omega} and \mathbf{r} are the angular velocity and radius of the Earth respectively.

But at a latitude of \varphi, isn't the radius in the above expression not the radius of the earth, r, but rcos\varphi? Assuming of course a spherical earth, which is not really correct.
 


Yes.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top