How Does Leibniz' Integral Rule Optimize Constants in an Integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adm_strat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Leibniz
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on applying Leibniz' Integral Rule to minimize the integral \(\int^{1}_{0}(ax+b-x^{2})^{2} dx\). The user correctly identifies that the limits of integration are constants, simplifying the differentiation to \(\frac{\partial}{\partial z} \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} f(x,z) dx = \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z} dx\). Through their calculations, they derive two equations: \(ax+b-x^{2}=0\) and \(2x-a=0\), leading to the relationships \(x=\frac{a}{2}\) and \(b=\frac{a^{2}}{2}\). The user acknowledges a mistake in not integrating before setting the equations to zero, highlighting the importance of thoroughness in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Leibniz' Integral Rule
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation and integration
  • Knowledge of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Ability to solve algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Leibniz' Integral Rule in various contexts
  • Learn techniques for minimizing integrals involving polynomial expressions
  • Explore advanced calculus topics, such as differentiation under the integral sign
  • Practice solving optimization problems using calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and optimization techniques, as well as anyone interested in the practical applications of Leibniz' Integral Rule.

adm_strat
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Leibniz' Integral rule

Homework Statement



Use the Leibniz' integral rule for differentiating under the integral sign to determine constants a and b such that the integral \int^{1}_{0}(ax+b-x^{2})^{2} dx is as small as possible.



Homework Equations



Leibniz' Interation was found at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeibnizIntegralRule.html" and is as follows:

\frac{\partial}{\partial z} \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} f(x,z) dx = \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z} dx + f(b(z),z) \frac{\partial b}{\partial z} - f(a(z),z) \frac{\partial a}{\partial z}



The Attempt at a Solution



On my integral the limits of integration are constants and therefore the integral breaks down to:

\frac{\partial}{\partial z} \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} f(x,z) dx = \int^{b(z)}_{a(z)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z} dx

I took the partial with respect to x and I got:

f_{x} = 2 (ax +b - x^{2})(2x-a)=0



So two Equations result from that: ax+b-x^{2}=0 AND 2x-a=0


Which gives: x=\frac{a}{2}

I substituted that into the other equation and got

b=\frac{a^{2}}{2}

I know this seems like some algebra somputations but I am really asking to see if I did the Leibniz integration underneath the integral correctly since I am stuck. Thanks for the help in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you remember to integrate fx from 0 to 1 before setting the whole thing to zero?
 
Duh, no I didn't integrate. Lol, I feel kinda dumb after that one. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K