How Does Lowering Half a Rope Affect Its Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
Lowering half of a 3.60 kg rope from a height of 23.0 m results in a change in potential energy that can be calculated using the center of mass concept. Initially, the potential energy was incorrectly calculated as -203 J, but upon realizing that only half the rope's mass is involved, the correct mass used is 1.8 kg. The change in potential energy is then recalculated to be 102 J. This demonstrates the importance of considering the mass distribution when calculating potential energy changes. The discussion highlights the relevance of center of mass in potential energy problems.
Shifty
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A uniform 3.60- kg rope 23.0 m long lies on the ground at the top of a vertical cliff. A mountain climber at the top let's down half of it to help his partner climb up the cliff.

What was the change in potential energy of the rope during this maneuver?

-This in a moment of inertia assignment, so I'm guessing it uses it somewhere. Don't have a clue after that.

-Help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be a moment of inertia question, but this is a center of mass problem. I'll give you a hint: you can consider an object's mass to be concentrated at its center of mass when calculating gravitational potential energy.
 
ideasrule said:
It may be a moment of inertia question, but this is a center of mass problem. I'll give you a hint: you can consider an object's mass to be concentrated at its center of mass when calculating gravitational potential energy.

Thanks for the reply :), but I already tried that and calculated the change to be -203 J, unfortunately it didn't yield a correct answer.

\Delta U=-mgy=203

y=23m/4

EDIT!: looking at this reply I realized the total mass would only be half since only half of the rope was lowered. That solved it, thanks :)!

m=3.6kg/2, implies \Delta U=102J
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top