How Does Momentum Conservation Affect Sled Speed When Susan Jumps On and Off?

AI Thread Summary
When Susan drops onto the empty sled, the sled slows down due to the conservation of momentum, as her mass adds to the system. When she falls sideways off the sled, the sled maintains its speed because she takes her momentum with her, resulting in no net change in the sled's velocity. If she had jumped off with zero momentum, the sled would have retained its original speed. The discussion emphasizes that the direction of Susan's fall affects the sled's speed, particularly in terms of momentum conservation. The key takeaway is that the sled's speed remains unchanged when she falls off sideways.
gkangelexa
Messages
81
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An empty sled is sliding on frictionless ice when Susan drops vertically from a tree above onto the sled. When she lands, does the sled speed up, slow down, or keep the same speed?
The sled slows down.
Later, susan falls sideways off the sled. When she drops off, does the sled speed up, slow down, or keep the same speed?



The Attempt at a Solution



I would think that when she falls off the sled, the speed of the sled should increase because m2 got smaller, so to conserve momentum, v2 should get larger
m1v1 = m2v2


however, the answer is that the sled keeps the same speed... why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gkangelexa said:

Homework Statement



An empty sled is sliding on frictionless ice when Susan drops vertically from a tree above onto the sled. When she lands, does the sled speed up, slow down, or keep the same speed?
The sled slows down.
Later, susan falls sideways off the sled. When she drops off, does the sled speed up, slow down, or keep the same speed?



The Attempt at a Solution



I would think that when she falls off the sled, the speed of the sled should increase because m2 got smaller, so to conserve momentum, v2 should get larger
m1v1 = m2v2


however, the answer is that the sled keeps the same speed... why?

Remember she fell sideways off the sled, taking her momentum with her.
 
PeterO said:
Remember she fell sideways off the sled, taking her momentum with her.

Would she not have "taken her momentum with her" if she had fallen off the back instead of sideways?
 
gkangelexa said:
Would she not have "taken her momentum with her" if she had fallen off the back instead of sideways?

Yes she would. BUT if she took her life in her hands, stood up, then kicked forward on the sled so that she "left the sled" with zero momentum, the sled would have continued with all the momentum - back to its original speed.

That "kicking off" is the way people commonly dismount from a skate board, on which they are already standing.

Peter

By the way, you were only asked what would happen if she fell out sideways!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top