How does Nucleation work? Relationship with vacuums?

AI Thread Summary
Nucleation is the process where small deviations from uniformity in a system can lead to the formation of new phases or structures, illustrated through a diffusion analogy. In cosmology, nucleation relates to quantum tunneling and the conditions of the vacuum during the Big Bang. The discussion emphasizes the importance of providing a clear understanding of one's current knowledge level to facilitate meaningful answers. Participants are encouraged to reference existing literature or research to enhance the dialogue. The thread concludes without further responses.
Rodrigo Olivera
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
What is nucleation and how it works? In cosmology, which is the relationship that nucleation have with quantum tunneling, vacuums and Big Bang?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to tell what level of answer you expect, but I'd personally explain nucleation by using a diffusion analogy. If you drop a little bit of food coloring in a glass of water, it will start mixing with the water by diffusion and eventually there's about as much coloring in every small volume element of the liquid. Now, imagine that we're doing diffusion backwards in time (antidiffusion). Then if there's even a tiny bit more solute in one part of a liquid, the solute will start concentrating towards that point. But if you try to anti-diffuse a solution where there's exactly as much solute everwhere, the concentration profile doesn't change (and neither does it in forward-diffusion). So, here we have an example where a very small deviation from uniformity will "nucleate" the anti-diffusion process.
 
Rodrigo Olivera said:
What is nucleation and how it works? In cosmology, which is the relationship that nucleation have with quantum tunneling, vacuums and Big Bang?
We cannot answer questions out of the blue, since we do not write entire textbooks to answer a question. The more as
hilbert2 said:
It's hard to tell what level of answer you expect
which makes it hard to answer at all. You should provide at least the level of your understanding and what you've found so far by Google or Wikipedia searches, or even better by looking for papers on the subject, e.g. on arxiv.org. This might be sources we don't really want to debate upon, but it could tell us where you stand and what in detail you didn't understand.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top