How does one descibe a co-orbiting system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
A co-orbiting system typically refers to two or more celestial bodies that share the same orbit around a common center of gravity. While stars orbiting a common center, like in binary star systems, are considered co-orbiting, the solar system's planets and their "wobble" around the Sun do not fit this definition. The discussion also touches on whether the Milky Way, with its central black hole and orbiting stars, qualifies as a co-orbiting system. The term for a system where multiple objects orbit a common center of gravity is still being clarified. Overall, the distinction between co-orbiting and other orbital relationships is key to understanding these celestial dynamics.
Lino
Messages
309
Reaction score
4
Hi, Is there a generally accepted description of the objects that make up a co-orbiting system? For example, I understand that two starts orbiting around a common centre of gravity would be considered co-orbiting, but given that the sun and planets ordit the "wobble" point / common centre of gravity, would the solar system also be considered co-orbiting? Would the Milkyway (the black hole at the centre and the stars that ordit it (both close in, speeding around the black hole, and further out like the sun) be considered a co-orbiting system?

Thanking you in anticipation.


Regards,


Noel.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I think co-orbiting means the two bodies actually shares the same orbit. For example Jupiter and the trojan satellites.
 
Oh. Thanks Jobiqoud. I understand.

So, I suppose that my first question is actually "what do you call that type of system, where two or more objects orbit a common center of gravity?" Incase my description isn't to clear, I'm trying to describe the orbit of an exo-solar planet causing the wobble of its star (I appreciate that actual searches are based on redshift of light, I'm just using the star / exoplanet as an example of a system that I am trying to describe).

Regards,

Noel.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top