How Does Photon Energy Influence Exponential Attenuation in Matter?

AI Thread Summary
Photon intensity attenuates exponentially within matter due to probabilistic interactions with electrons, which require a constant attenuation coefficient. Compton interactions, where photons lose energy and are scattered, complicate this understanding as they suggest varying probabilities based on the incident photon energy and scattering angles. However, the original beam's attenuation is considered regardless of the energy history of scattered photons, as each interaction effectively removes a photon from the beam. Thus, while energy loss occurs, the exponential model holds because it focuses on the overall reduction of the beam's intensity rather than the energy of individual photons post-interaction. This explanation reconciles the apparent contradiction between Compton scattering and the exponential attenuation theory.
Orlando
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I am researching how photon intensity attenuates within matter and am a bit confused by what I have come across.

Several sources state that the attenuation of photon intensity within matter is exponential (as a function of depth). The explanation is that photon interactions with electrons in matter are probabilistic and the chances of such interactions must therefore be equal for each photon in order for an exponential relationship to eventuate, otherwise the attenuation coefficient would not be constant.

However, all sources state that with Compton interactions a photon is scattered with decreased energy and that the energy of an incident photon influences the probability of the photon being scattered at a particular angle (this is based on the Klein-Nishina differential cross section). My issue is that this does not agree with the exponential attenuation theory as it appears to me that as the incident photons lose energy as they are scattered, the rate at which they lose energy will decrease as it will become less likely that they will be scattered at large angles. An exponential relationship would require a constant rate of energy loss, would it not?

Can someone help me understand this? Much appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you speak about attenuation, you usually consider collimated beam (usually of defined frequency). Thus single Compton interaction (or any other scattering) removes this photon from the original beam - so it is considered lost - the same as absorbed photon.

Further history of scattered (in any mechanism) photon does not count - the original beam is already weakened, and probability that after many scatterings photon eventually returns to the beam is usually neglected.
 
Thanks for the response, that makes sense.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top