Discussion Overview
The discussion centers on the exploration of 2+2 dimensional spacetimes, including their physical implications and the challenges associated with them. Participants seek resources and references related to the study of these spacetimes, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants inquire about resources for studying 2+2 dimensional spacetimes, noting difficulties in finding relevant information online.
- One participant mentions the potential issue of closed timelike curves arising from having two timelike directions, referencing a paper that discusses the preference for a 3+1 metric over other signatures.
- Another participant critiques the argument that certain physical conditions must hold to avoid a "boring" universe, suggesting a connection to the Anthropic Principle.
- A participant highlights the work of science fiction writer Greg Egan, who explores such spacetimes in his book "Dichronauts," indicating that his mathematical descriptions provide insights into these concepts.
- One participant discusses the generalizations of Nash embedding theorems to pseudoriemannian manifolds, emphasizing the requirements for embedding arbitrary manifolds.
- Another participant notes that while there is a wealth of mathematical literature on "neutral signature," there is a scarcity of physics-related discussions due to the complexities introduced by multiple time directions.
- A question is raised about the nature of spacetime variables and their measurement, leading to a correction regarding the classification of vectors in spacetime.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the implications of multiple timelike directions and the nature of spacetime itself. There is no consensus on the physical viability of 2+2 dimensional spacetimes or the interpretation of spacetime variables.
Contextual Notes
Some claims about the nature of spacetime and the implications of multiple time dimensions remain unresolved, with participants providing varying interpretations and references without reaching a definitive conclusion.