How Does Polarization Affect Capacitor Charge and Potential Difference?

AI Thread Summary
Polarization in a capacitor with a dielectric reduces the potential difference between the conductors, allowing the capacitor to store more charge at a given potential. The process of polarizing the dielectric involves doing work to separate electrons from their nuclei, which contributes to the potential difference. This extra work is necessary because the energy from the source is used both for charge separation at the plates and for polarizing the dielectric material. As a result, charging the capacitor requires more energy per unit charge due to the additional energy needed for polarization. Ultimately, the effect of polarization is to decrease the potential difference while increasing the capacitor's charge storage capacity.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Say you have two conductors and there is a dielectric material between them (a capacitor with a dielectric). The field will the polarize the atoms in the dielectric in such away that the potential difference between the two conductors is weakened. Thus a capacitor with a dielectric between it's conducting surfaces can practically store more charge at a given potential. This is, as I understand it, what the effect of polarization is.

1) Is that correct?

2) To polarize a material you do work, as you are pulling the electrons away from the nucleus. This extra work must go into the potential difference between - and + - i.e. it must be associated with how difficult it is to pull electrons from + to -. Does all the above mentioned, which implies that separating charges gets easier with polarization, account for this "extra" work?
 
Science news on Phys.org
1) yes

2)

To polarize a material you do work, as you are pulling the electrons away from the nucleus. This extra work must go into the potential difference between - and + - i.e. it must be associated with how difficult it is to pull electrons from + to -. Does all the above mentioned, which implies that separating charges gets easier with polarization, account for this "extra" work?

The energy lost by the source (battery) goes into separation of the charges at the capacitor plates (potential eletrostatic energy) and also to polarization of the dielectric (also potential energy, but of the charges in the dielectric).
 
Yes exactly, so doesn't the polarization itself require extra energy from the source? And thus, is thoroughly correct to just say that the potential difference decreases, when the material gets polarized? - evidently we see that more energy is required to charge up the capacitor per unit charge, because of the extra charges.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top