How Does Pressure Affect Seawater Volume and Density in the Mariana Trench?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Solids
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of pressure on the volume and density of seawater in the Mariana Trench, specifically addressing calculations related to changes in volume and density at extreme depths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the bulk modulus formula to calculate changes in volume due to pressure. There is uncertainty about the correctness of initial calculations and whether to include a negative sign to indicate a decrease in volume.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting calculations and seeking clarification on specific parts. There is a recognition of the need to verify the signs in the calculations, and one participant has indicated they resolved part of the problem independently.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply.

physics_geek
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The deepest point in any ocean is in the Mariana Trench, which is about 11 km deep, in the Pacific. The pressure at this depth is huge, about 1.13 108 N/m2. (Take the bulk modulus of seawater to be 2.34 109 N/m2)
(a) Calculate the change in volume of 1.2 m3 of seawater carried from the surface to this deepest point.
(b) The density of seawater at the surface is 1.03 103 kg/m3. Find its density at the bottom.


Homework Equations


B = changeP/(changevolume/Vinitial)

or change_volume = Vinitial(change_p)/B


The Attempt at a Solution


im not sure if for part a i just plug in the numbers they give..im getting like .0579 m^3 but that's wrong
any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did one determine that 0.0579 m3 is the wrong answer. Perhaps it should also have a - sign to indicate a decrease in volume, but the magnitude is right.
 
ok yea it was -.0579 I am sorry
do you know how to do part b?
 
nvm..i got part b
thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K