How Does Qubit Orientation on the Bloch Sphere Indicate Quantum States?

*FaerieLight*
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
There is something that I don't quite understand in relation to the Bloch Sphere representation of qubits. I've read that any vector on the sphere is a superposition of two basic states, like spin up and spin down, denoted by |1> and |0>.
So does this mean that if the vector is at z=0 (pointing towards the equator), then it has neither spin-up nor spin-down components?
If the vector is pointing up 45 degrees above the equator towards |1>, then how is this represented by equations as a superposition of |1> and |0> ?
Also, if a qubit is not affected by external noise, then does it remain a static unprecessing vector on the Bloch Sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*FaerieLight* said:
So does this mean that if the vector is at z=0 (pointing towards the equator), then it has neither spin-up nor spin-down components?
No, it means that it is an equal superposition of spin-up and spin down,
$$
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ |0 \rangle + e^{i \phi} | 1 \rangle \right]
$$
*FaerieLight* said:
If the vector is pointing up 45 degrees above the equator towards |1>, then how is this represented by equations as a superposition of |1> and |0> ?
The general equation is
$$
\cos \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) |0 \rangle + \sin \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) e^{i \phi} | 1 \rangle
$$
so ##\theta = 135^\circ = 3\pi/4## results in
$$
\frac{\sqrt{2 - \sqrt{2}}}{2} |0 \rangle + \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}{2} e^{i \phi} | 1 \rangle
$$
so a superposition that is more ##|1 \rangle## than ##|0 \rangle##.

*FaerieLight* said:
Also, if a qubit is not affected by external noise, then does it remain a static unprecessing vector on the Bloch Sphere?
Only if the two states have the same energy. This is not true in most cases, so one will see a precession as the angle ##\phi## will be time-dependent.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top