How Does Reciprocating Motion Affect Alternator Efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
Reciprocating motion in wave energy converters can impact alternator efficiency due to the continuous stop-start nature of bi-directional rotating turbines. While there is no inherent energy loss in such systems, factors like slippage and friction may reduce overall efficiency. The cyclic operation results in less energy availability compared to systems with constant energy input, such as falling water. A theoretical reduction factor of about 1/√2 is suggested as a best-case scenario for efficiency loss. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing wave energy converter designs.
JJ21
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Currently just looking through a few concepts for wave energy converters and I noticed that a few designs use bi-directional rotating turbines (or linear action) meaning the alternator has to continuously keep rotating in one direction, stopping, rotating in the other direction, stopping etc etc. I would have thought that this continuous stop start would severely affect the alternator's efficiency and the power generated? If anyone knows of any papers on this or it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are many examples of machines with reciprocating motion. There is no inherent energy loss involved (as in a pendulum) although slippage and friction could be factors which could reduce efficiency.
The cyclic nature of these systems would mean that less energy would be available than for a system where water is, for instance, falling all the time from a height. But you 'take what you can get', surely and you are probably talking about something like a 1/√2 reduction factor (best case) which isn't too bad.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top