How Does Scale Factor Affect Objects in Expanding Universe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effect of the scale factor in an expanding universe on physical objects and the properties of positively curved space. It clarifies that while the universe expands, gravitationally bound systems like meter sticks and human bodies do not expand, as atomic forces are stronger than gravitational effects. The participants also analyze a multiple-choice question regarding properties of positively curved space, concluding that the volume of a sphere in such space is less than the standard formula. The confusion about the implications of redshift on physical objects is addressed, emphasizing that only the distances between galaxies change, not the objects themselves. Overall, the conversation highlights key concepts in cosmology and geometry related to the expanding universe.
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
I will be writing my final exam tomorrow evening, and I am currently terribly stuck on the following practice problems. I have posted my thoughts below each problem. They look tricky to me. It would be very nice if someone could help me out and I will remain eternally grateful for your help!


1) You have a stick 1 meter long (physicsal size) today. What was the length of the stick at redshift 1.0? The scale factor at redshift 1.0 is 1/2 if we assume that the current scale factor is 1.
This looks very very tricky to me. The distance between galaxies is certainly smaller at redshift 1.0 because the scale factor is smaller and "space" itself stretches out as time goes on. But does the same apply to things like the meter stick? I am so confused...


2) (Multiple Choice) Which of the following statement(s) is (are) incorrect for a positively curved space (think about the surface of the earth):
a) Parallel lines converge
b) The sume of angles in a triangle is less than 180 degrees.
c) The volume of a sphere is larger than (4/3)pi*r^3, where r is the radius
d) If you strart traveling in one direction, it is possible that you come back to where you started
e) IF the radius of the curvature become larger and larger, the space will look increasingly flatter to you

I believe that a, d, and e are correct, and b is incorrect, but I am totally unsure about c, is c true or not and why?

Thank you!:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingwinner said:
I will be writing my final exam tomorrow evening, and I am currently terribly stuck on the following practice problems. I have posted my thoughts below each problem. They look tricky to me. It would be very nice if someone could help me out and I will remain eternally grateful for your help!
I fear that my reply may come to late for your examination, but looking at the answers you've given I wouldn't be two worried :smile:
kingwinner said:
1) You have a stick 1 meter long (physicsal size) today. What was the length of the stick at redshift 1.0? The scale factor at redshift 1.0 is 1/2 if we assume that the current scale factor is 1.
This looks very very tricky to me. The distance between galaxies is certainly smaller at redshift 1.0 because the scale factor is smaller and "space" itself stretches out as time goes on. But does the same apply to things like the meter stick? I am so confused...
An Astronomy Paper Mark Scheme said:
2. We live in an expanding Universe. Does this mean that a meter stick and the atoms in your body will also expand and get bigger?

While it is true that the Universe is expanding as a whole, a meter stick and our own bodies do not expand. These are system which are "gravitationally bound", which means that gravity is stronger than other forces and the expansion of space. Atoms are held together by the nuclear force which is 1038 times stronger than gravity and stronger than the expansion of the Universe.
kingwinner said:
2) (Multiple Choice) Which of the following statement(s) is (are) incorrect for a positively curved space (think about the surface of the earth):
a) Parallel lines converge
b) The sume of angles in a triangle is less than 180 degrees.
c) The volume of a sphere is larger than (4/3)pi*r^3, where r is the radius
d) If you strart traveling in one direction, it is possible that you come back to where you started
e) IF the radius of the curvature become larger and larger, the space will look increasingly flatter to you

I believe that a, d, and e are correct, and b is incorrect, but I am totally unsure about c, is c true or not and why?
You are correct in all your answers. (c) is incorrect, the [inside] volume of a sphere in positively curved space is always less than (4/3)pi*r^3, which can be proved mathematically from the generalisation of the sphere into metric spaces, but is something I'm not going to do here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top