How Does Simplifying Quadratic Equations Affect Their Solutions?

autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
1) When you simplify a quadratic equation (or others) to make it positive or to make the a coefficient equal to 1, do you divide by whatever number you need to make it one or do you factor it out?

e.g.

0 = -x^2 + 4x + 21
0 = x^2 - 4x - 21

or

0 = -(x^2 - 4x - 21)



2) When you do simplify a quadratic by dividing it by whatever the a coefficient is, why do the x-values for the parabola remain the same the but the y doesn't? Does this mean you should only simplify quadratic equations to find x but leave it as is to find y-coordinates? For example for this equation I must find the x and y coordinates for the turning point, so I'm instructed to convert it into TP-form

y = 2x^2 - 12x + 22
y = x^2 - 6x + 11
y = x^2 - 6x + 9 -9 + 11
y = (x-3)^2 + 2

The y-coordinate is only half of what it should be because I divided by 2. Other than multiplying it by whatever I divided the equation by in the first place, is there another way to compensate for it? All my textbook says is to divide the equation but 'such problems are beyond the scope of this course'.


3) Last question :p

Am I factoring this correctly?
x^2 - 14x - mx + 1
x^2 - (14 + m)x + 1

If I were to plug 'b' into b^2, would it be -(14+m)^2?

-(14+m)^2
-(196 + 28m + m^2)
-196 - 28m - m^2

or do I have to times the negative one by everything inside first?

(-14-m)^2
196 + 28m + m^2

Would that mean that factoring the above expression like this:
x^2 +(-14 - m)x + 1 be valid?



Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To help understanding your number 1 and number 2, just think what you are doing or trying to do: Dividing zero by a number is one kind of result; dividing a variable by a number is a different kind of result.

If you use a function, written as y=ax2+bx+c, then you are indicating a function, in this general case, y as a function of x. When y is nonzero, then y/a is not zero. When y is equal to zero, then y/a is also zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top