A How Does Stellar Radiation Clear Dust from a Proto-Planetary Disc?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter RJ Emery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dust Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Radiation from a star clears dust from a proto-planetary disc by exerting radiation pressure that pushes smaller dust particles outward, transforming the area from opaque to transparent. The effectiveness of this radiation pressure is due to its force acting on the surface area of the dust, which is proportional to the radius squared, while gravitational force is proportional to the radius cubed. This differential scaling means that smaller particles are more affected by radiation than larger, more massive objects. The discussion highlights the complexities of how forces interact differently based on size, using analogies to illustrate these principles. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for studying the formation of planetary systems.
RJ Emery
Messages
114
Reaction score
6
How does radiation from a star clear dust from a proto-planetary disc, changing the area from one of opaqueness to one of transparency?

Please note that I am a retired engineer with an interest in astronomy, cosmology and particle physics but very much a layman..
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes davenn
Thanks for answering my question.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
RJ Emery said:
Thanks for answering my question.

Thanks for asking your question. :wink:
 
RJ Emery said:
How does radiation from a star clear dust from a proto-planetary disc,
I'd like to add to the contribution from @Drakkith . You might ask why the radiation affects just the dust and not all the bigger stuff. It's because the area that the radiation acts on an object (and hence the force) is proportional to the radius squared (A = πr2) BUT the gravitational force on an object is proportional to its Mass, which is proportional to the radius cubed. (Mass = density times 4πr3/3). For small objects the radiation pressure wind and for large (massive) objects, the gravitational force wind.
This is just an example of how things don't scale in a simple way - why fleas can jump much higher than elephants - in terms of the animals' own height - and why a mouse can jump of the Empire State Building and land safely but one of us . . . . . . . .
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top