How Does Switching Polarity Affect Capacitor Energy and Heat Dissipation?

AI Thread Summary
Switching the polarity of a capacitor affects its energy and heat dissipation, as the energy released during this process is equivalent to the energy delivered by the battery plus the energy stored in the capacitors before and after the switch is flipped. The energy dissipated is calculated based on the change in charge of the left capacitor when connected to the battery. The charge delivered by the battery is equal to the change in charge of the left capacitor, while some current also flows through the right capacitor, not just the battery. The difference in charge before and after switching provides the necessary information to determine the energy supplied by the battery, which ultimately converts to heat. The discussion emphasizes that no net energy is added to the capacitors, indicating that all energy supplied by the battery is lost as heat.
varunKanpur
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am not able to solve this problem

image.jpg


I am thinking that Co would be charging in reverse polarity switch is shifted to 2 position, so change in energy of capacitor will be released as heat energy, i.e twice the energy of stored capacitor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice problem :).

The energy that dissipates will be equal to the energy delivered by the battery + (the energy stored in the capacitors before you flip the switch) - (the energy stored in the capacitors after you flip the switch).

The energy in the capacitors before and after you flip the switch is equal, because the end situation after the switch is flipped is just a reflection of the situation before the switch is flipped. The voltage across C0 will be in the other direction, but that won't matter for its energy.

So you only need the energy delivered by the battery which is QV, where Q is the amount of charge it delivered.

Now you can find the amount of charge that the battery delivered just by watching what happens to the charge on the left C, because when you disconnect C0 from point 1, there will be no current anywhere in the circuit, and after you connect C0 to point 2, all of the current that is going through the battery is also going through the left C.

So you just have to find the charge on the left capacitor before and after you flip the switch, and multiply it by V.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
willem2 said:
Now you can find the amount of charge that the battery delivered just by watching what happens to the charge on the left C, because when you disconnect C0 from point 1, there will be no current anywhere in the circuit, and after you connect C0 to point 2, all of the current that is going through the battery is also going through the left C.

So you just have to find the charge on the left capacitor before and after you flip the switch, and multiply it by V.

Thank for the quick reply. When I will connect Co to point 2 then a fraction of current will flow through to the left C and rest through Co.

The work done by the battery = To the heat generated.
When the switch is closed the polarity of capacitor changes.
Before Switching, Charge is -Q| |Q
But after switching, Charge would be Q| |-Q
Then the Charge delivered by the battery is 2Q.
According to my calculation, Q=CCoV/(2C Co)

Therefore the answer should be 2CCoV2/(2C Co)
 
varunKanpur said:
Thank for the quick reply. When I will connect Co to point 2 then a fraction of current will flow through to the left C and rest through Co.

The point is that when the switch makes a connection at point 2, the left C is in series with the battery, so the charge delivered by the battery is equal to the change in charge of the left C.

This is not the case for C0. You calculated the charge on before and after the flip correctly, but some of the current going through C0 will go through the rightmost C, and not the battery.

before the flip, the leftmost C has charge

\frac { V C^2} {2C + C_0}

and after it:

\frac { V C (C+C_0)} {2C + C_0}

The difference is the answer you need.

This is half your answer, and that's because half of the charge needed to decharge C0 and charge it in the opposite direction, will be delivered by the righthand C and not by the battery.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
varunKanpur said:
I am not able to solve this problem
It's indeed a good question! http://physicsforums.bernhardtmediall.netdna-cdn.com/images/icons/icon6.gif

With this being a multi-choice question, I'd be seeking a reasonably quick (or insightful) method of deciding on an answer.

Examining the options, we can immediately eliminate 2 simply because they don't have units consistent with energy. This then leaves a 50% chance of guessing the correct option. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
willem2 said:
The point is that when the switch makes a connection at point 2, the left C is in series with the battery, so the charge delivered by the battery is equal to the change in charge of the left C.

This is not the case for C0. You calculated the charge on before and after the flip correctly, but some of the current going through C0 will go through the rightmost C, and not the battery.

before the flip, the leftmost C has charge

\frac { V C^2} {2C + C_0}

and after it:

\frac { V C (C+C_0)} {2C + C_0}

The difference is the answer you need.
http://physicsforums.bernhardtmediall.netdna-cdn.com/images/icons/icon14.gif That looks right. The difference is a measure of the quantity of charge that has been supplied by the battery to effect the changes brought about by the switching. No nett energy has been added to the bank of capacitors, so the energy supplied by the battery must have all gone into heat as the losses.

The extra energy supplied by the battery = V.ΔQ
where ΔQ is that difference in charge determined above.

Well done!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top