How Does Temperature Affect Cell Population Growth Over Time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an experiment testing how temperature affects cell population growth, with data from six flasks at varying temperatures. Participants are asked to analyze the growth patterns, specifically excluding flask three due to faulty data. The generalization sought in question D involves identifying trends in cell growth across the other flasks, while question E requires formulating a hypothesis based on those observed patterns. Clarification is provided that understanding the growth trend is essential for developing a hypothesis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing patterns in the data to answer the essay questions effectively.
addicted
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I seriously need all the help I can get because I don't understand these last two questions of this essay, I got everything else figured out and done except for the two at the bottom. Details;
"A scientist designed the following experiment to test the limits of cell population growth. Cells were grown in six flasks under different temperature conditions. Each flask contained a nutrient broth of the same concentration. The table below shows the data obtained from the experiment. Study the table and answer the questions that follow in a well devolped essay."

Flask 1: Temp: 0 Vol of nutri: 500 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 1.0 Day 3: 1.0
Flask 2: Temp: 20 Vol of nutri: 500 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 1.2 Day 3: 1.2
Flask 3: Temp: 30 Vol of nutri: 1000 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 2.6 Day 3: 3.2
Flask 4: Temp: 40 Vol of nutri: 500 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 2.2 Day 3: 2.2
Flask 5: Temp: 50 Vol of nutri: 500 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 2.0 Day 3: 2.0
Flask 6: Temp: 60 Vol of nutri: 500 No of cells day 1: 1.0 Day 2: 1.4 Day 3: 1.4

Two questions I don't get;
D. Based on the data, what generalization can you make concerning the growth of a population of cells overtime? Exclude results from the flask with the faulty data.

E. Develop a hypothesis to account for the generalization you made in answer D.

please and thank you everybody.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some of your own effort before we can help you. Perhaps a brief summary of the first few questions will help provide some context as well. For example, in question D, they say to exclude the flask with faulty data...which flask is that, and how did you determine the data were faulty?
 
The faulty data is flask 3.. but, I can't even go into detail on those questions because I don't understand them. I'm not asking for answers, or for anyone else to do my work.. just for a little bit of a detailed explanation on what I'm supposed to do.
 
addicted said:
The faulty data is flask 3.. but, I can't even go into detail on those questions because I don't understand them. I'm not asking for answers, or for anyone else to do my work.. just for a little bit of a detailed explanation on what I'm supposed to do.

Okay, D is asking you to look for a pattern in the cell growth and describe it. If you look at every flask other than flask 3, what happens over each of the three days? Do you see a pattern? Describe that pattern.

For E, if you figure out the pattern they're asking about in D, you then are being asked to explain why you think that pattern is happening (generate an hypothesis). In this case, looking at what's different about flask 3 might give you a clue.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top