How Does the Angle of Tilt Affect Gyroscope Precession Rate?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the precession rate of a spinning top tilted at an angle of 26° from the vertical. Participants explore the relevant equations, particularly Ω=Mgr/Iω, and debate the correct interpretation of variables, especially the distance from the center of mass to the pivot point. There is confusion regarding the definition of r and how it relates to the angle of tilt, with suggestions that r should be calculated using trigonometric functions. The conversation also touches on the relationship between torque and angular momentum, emphasizing the need to understand how these concepts interact in three-dimensional space. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying physics equations to a tilted spinning object.
J-dizzal
Messages
394
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A top spins at 33 rev/s about an axis that makes an angle of 26° with the vertical. The mass of the top is 0.47 kg, its rotational inertia about its central axis is 5.0 x 10-4 kg·m2, and its center of mass is 3.1 cm from the pivot point. The spin is clockwise from an overhead view. (a) What is the precession rate? (b) What is the direction of the precession as viewed from overhead?

Homework Equations


Ω=Mgr/Iω

The Attempt at a Solution


20150713_225445_zpsgqmqlm6s.jpg


It looks like most of the variables were given in the problem statement, but I am not sure which I am getting wrong. i tried g=mgcosθ because the angled axis but that didnt work. I am not sure about my r value also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J-dizzal said:
Ω=Mgr/Iω
A quoted equation doesn't mean much without the accompanying definition of the variables.
You may notice that there's no mention of an angle to the vertical here, so the question is, how is r defined?
The more basic equation is ##\dot L = \tau##, the torque. Certainly ##\tau = mgh \sin(\theta)##, where h is the distance from pivot to mass centre, but what about ##\dot L##? This is not simply ##I \omega \Omega##. That would be the case were it precessing in a horizontal plane, but here it is not. What do you think the equation for ##\dot L## would be?
 
haruspex said:
A quoted equation doesn't mean much without the accompanying definition of the variables.
Ω=Mgr/Iω
where; Ω=precession rate, M=mass, g=9.8m/s/s, r=distance from com to pivot point, I=rotational inertia, ω=spin rate of top.

haruspex said:
You may notice that there's no mention of an angle to the vertical here, so the question is, how is r defined?
I see a mentioned angle to the vertical in the problem statement as 26 degrees from vertical. So then r=0.031sin26.
##\dot L## would be the rotational inertia equation for a disk =½MR2 where R is the radius of the disk and M is mass.
 
haruspex said:
What do you think the equation for ##\dot L## would be?
##\dot L## should be =Iω, because its a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis.
edit; or would it be equal to the torque because that is the only external force acting on the system?
20150714_132038_zpspt0fmvry.jpg
 
J-dizzal said:
I see a mentioned angle to the vertical in the problem statement as 26 degrees from vertical.
Haruspex meant that equation did not mention any angle (not the problem statement).

J-dizzal said:
##\dot L## should be =Iω, because its a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis.
edit; or would it be equal to the torque because that is the only external force acting on the system?
L is Iω, ##\dot L## (with a dot on top) represents the time derivative of it. Yes it would be ##\tau = \dot L## but the question is what is ##\dot L##? (Re-read post#2)Imagine the torque vector in 3D. It is ##\vec R ×\vec {mg}## so it sticks out of your page. It represents the change in the vector L. How does this cause ##\vec L## to change?
Is there any part of the vector L which the torque doesn't change?
 
J-dizzal said:
Ω=Mgr/Iω
where; Ω=precession rate, M=mass, g=9.8m/s/s, r=distance from com to pivot point, I=rotational inertia, ω=spin rate of top.
Ok, so why did you interpret it as horizontal distance?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top