How Does the Charge Simulation Method Determine Q1, Q2, and Q3?

AI Thread Summary
The Charge Simulation Method determines the charges Q1, Q2, and Q3 based on their symmetrical arrangement, leading to Q1 being equal to Q3 at 6.97 x 10^-11 C. Q2 is calculated to be 1.44 x 10^-11 C. The user seeks assistance with understanding the method for finding these charges. Additionally, there is a request for guidance on how to upload a picture to the forum. The discussion focuses on the calculation and representation of electric charges in a symmetrical setup.
MissP.25_5
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
Hello. This is not homework, so I am posting this here because I feel this is the right place to do so.
How do I find charges Q1, Q2 and Q3? The answers are given as follow:

Q1 = Q3 (This is due to the symmetrical arrangement)
= 6.97 x 10^-11 [C]

Q2 = 1.44 x 10^-11 [C]

I really appreciate if anyone could help me out.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/98820721@N04
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How do I upload picture here?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top