A How Does the Darwin Reflectivity Curve Apply to Multi-Layered X-ray Scattering?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karl330
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
Karl330
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Hello I am doing research on kinematic and dynamic scattering of xrays on a crystals. I am attempting to simulate the diffraction patterns of a silicon substrate and I have already simulated two other layers of a Silicon Quantum Well and SiGe from which the hetero structure was composed of. In my book called Elements of Modern Xray Physics it tells me that the scattering amplitude squared is the scattered intensity. I understand that dynamical scattering is used for a substrate(infinite amounts of layers) but I am confused how to apply the equations of the Darwin Curve(dynamical under the curve and kinematical outside of the curve) to put into my code apart from using the scattered intensity with the kinematical approximation. The equations that I was given in the book are Intensity Reflectivity = (S_o/T_o)(S_o/T_o)* = (x-√x^2-1)^2 for x≥1, 1 for abs(x) ≤1, (x+√x^2-1)^2 for x≤1. Where x= ∈/g, ∈=mπζ-πζ, g is defined as the amplitude reflectivity for one layer. Sorry for the confusing symbols, I guess that is why I am so confused. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top