How Does the Electromagnetic Wave Equation Represent Electric Fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of electric fields in wave equations, specifically the expression involving angular frequency and the constant c. The correct form of the equation is e^(i*(angular frequency ^ (x/c))). To derive this expression, one must utilize Maxwell's equations and apply separation of variables in four dimensions. While the spatial components can be complex, the time dependence is more straightforward to derive. Understanding Maxwell's equations is essential, as they are fundamental to many physical phenomena.
outclassed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi I have a presentation tomorrow and have to explain a few wave equations. I am using a book to walk me through them but there is one point I don't understand:

At one point the book states:

Because k=(angular frequency)/c, we will represent the waves of the electric field as:

e^i (angular frequency ^ (x/c))

Now I am unsure what equation they used to get to this and also if its
e^i *(angular frequency ^ (x/c))
or
e^(i *(angular frequency ^ (x/c)))

Any help would be really great. I am sorry if this is a stupid question.
Thanks in advance,
Drew.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to derive that, you need to use maxwell's equations and then separation of variables in 4 dimensions (3space 1time). The spatial parts are much trickier as i recall, if your familiar with math methods it won't be TOO bad to derive the time dependence.
 
Ok so the Maxwell equations, I am not familiar with those, I may just list it as a given and hope no one asks questions, do you know which of the two equations i listed it would be?
e^i * stuff or e^(i*stuff)?
Thanks again.
 
its e^(i*stuff) not (e^i)*stuff.
Maxwell's equations are some of the most important in all of physics; there are 4 (and a half... don't worry about that) and they describe the vast majority of all physical phenomena in the universe.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top