How Does the Equation i=nFj Relate Current Density to Charge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around establishing a mathematical relationship between current density and charge in the context of capacitance. Participants highlight that the charge continuity equation connects charge density and current density, while also referencing Gauss's law for calculating total charge. The original poster seeks to compute capacitance using outputs from simulation software, specifically electric potential, flux density, field intensity, and current density. There is a focus on the need for clarity regarding the physical system being analyzed, particularly the dimensions and changes involved. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of relating these variables without a clear understanding of the underlying system.
Oscar6330
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Can we make a mathematical (equation) relationship between Current Density and Charge Q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm... it seems to me that without any additional information it is only possible to connect dQ/dt with j.
 
I am trying to find Q using a relationship in which there is no area A.

Knows are

electric potential U

Total flux density D

Total Field Intensity E

Current Density

Inductance.
 
There is a relationship between charge density and current density; the charge continuity equation.
 
Oscar6330, could you please be more specific? What is the physical system you are trying to describe? For instance, A is area of what? U is electric potential between what points? and so forth...
 
In a relativistic theory charge density and spatial current density form a four vector current density j_\mu. In the non relativistic limit they are related by the continuity equation.
 
I am trying to find out the capacitance of a system. Now C=Q/V. I am using a Simulation software. The only output parameters available are

electric potential U

Total flux density D

Total Field Intensity E

Current Density J

Inductance.

I am really stuck with it and need help as I am not a Physics guy. Pl tell me some equation
 
I don't quite understand...
What is total field intensity? at what point? and what is flux density?
If field intensity E is known on the surface S of the conductor you can integrate it over the surface to get total charge Q (Gauss's law)
$ Q = \varepsilon_0 \int_{S} E_n dA$.
Capacitance C is then C = Q/U.
I have a feeling that flux density is just $ \textbf{D} = \varepsilon_0 \textbf{E}$ so $ Q = \int_{S} D_n dA$
But I'm not sure...
May be capacitance of your system has already been calculated by someone? =)
 
LOL...well since this is not an assignment, so no one has solved it. So the problem still remains unsolved
 
  • #10
naturale said:
In a relativistic theory charge density and spatial current density form a four vector current density j_\mu. In the non relativistic limit they are related by the continuity equation.
It's a relativistic equation as well. The charge continuity equation is Lorentz invariant, and more, is covariant without connections on a curved spacetime.
 
  • #11
Ok. what i mean is that in the non relativistic limit the charge density is give by j_0 \propto |\phi^2| and it can be associate to a quantum probability but in the relativistic limit the charge density it is not positively defined and thus it is not consistent with a probability interpretation. J_0 \propto \phi* (d_t \phi) - (d_t \phi*) \phi.
 
  • #12
I don't know what a relativistic limit is. Usually you want to keep things at v<c. That way it all works out, is that Maxwell's equations are true, relativistic equations. The charge continuity equation is a direct mathematical consequence, and therefore relativistically invariant itself.
 
  • #13
To be honest, I cannot understand where its going. Can you guys please redirect to my topic
 
  • #14
you are right. the relativistic interpretation of the charge density as a probability can be the object of another topic.
 
  • #15
Oscar6330 said:
To be honest, I cannot understand where its going. Can you guys please redirect to my topic

Sure, Oscar. Without a little more to go on, we don't know what to go on. You need to explain your system.
 
  • #16
naturale said:
you are right. the relativistic interpretation of the charge density as a probability can be the object of another topic.

That sounds interesting. Why don't you start a thread?
 
  • #17
Well it is very simple. I want to compute capacitance C. Now from my simulation software i can only get the following outputs, which are

electric potential V

Total flux density B

Total Field Intensity H

Current Density J

Inductance.

So I just want an equation, which has these variables only to calculate Capacitance (and some constants)
 
  • #18
Oscar6330 said:
Well it is very simple. I want to compute capacitance C. Now from my simulation software i can only get the following outputs, which are

electric potential V

Total flux density B

Total Field Intensity H

Current Density J

Inductance.

So I just want an equation, which has these variables only to calculate Capacitance (and some constants)

You talked about a 'system'. Is it a circuit? Is it a component? What are the dimensions? Are there changes invloved that are fast enough that all of Maxwell's equations are needed, so that B is a factor? J is current density. Current density of what? You do need to be more specific.
 
  • #19
System: Simple Parallel plate capacitor. We are changing the distance between the plates.

Dimension: Let A=w h, distance between plates r

Change: The distance being changed is very fast.
 
  • #20
What material is between the plates? Does current enter the plates? If so where? Is it in a circuit? You will have to do much better to get more answers.

C = \epsilon_r \epsilon_0 \frac{wh}{r} ,

where r << w, r << h
 
  • #21
can you eliminate "r" from the equation, since r is changing and replace it with one of the following variables

electric potential V

Total flux density B

Total Field Intensity H

Current Density J

Inductance.
 
  • #22
Oscar6330 said:
can you eliminate "r" from the equation, since r is changing and replace it with one of the following variables

electric potential V

Total flux density B

Total Field Intensity H

Current Density J

Inductance.

No. I am tired of guessing games.
 
  • #23
Could someone explain to me what B, H, J and "changing r" have to do with capacitance? %/ Calculating capacitance is an electrostatic problem... isn't it?
 
  • #24
i=nFj

i --> current density
nF--> charge transferrred(coulombs /mol)
j--->flux of reactant per unit area(mol/s cm2)
 
Back
Top