MHB How does the equation y = 3 + (4/2)x represent Bob's cake baking rate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Bos has 3 cakes and bakes 4 cakes every 2 hours.

The textbook tells me that the correct algebraic interpretation of the above statement is y = 3 + (4/2)x.

I cannot see the connection between the words and this linear equation.

Can someone explain in what way does the equation represent the statement about Bob and his cakes?

The author decided to use y.

I can see that "3 cakes and" = 3 +.

I do not understand how 4/2 represents "4 cakes every 2 hours."

What does x represent here?

What does y represent here?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't like this problem because the number of cakes Bob has at some given time would be a discrete function, not continuous. So, let's use a problem that is mathematically equivalent, but lends itself more readily to a continuous function.

Initially, Bob finds that he is 3 miles from home and moving at a constant velocity he finds that for every 2 hours that goes by, he is 4 miles farther from home...find Bob's distance from home in miles as a function of time in hours. And so we would have:

$$D(t)=\frac{4\text{ mi}}{2\text{ hr}}t\text{ hr}+3\text{ mi}=(2t+3)\text{ mi}$$

Does that make more sense?
 
I understand parts of your word problem. For example, I know where D(t) comes from. I do not understand the conversion factor of 4 miles/2 hours. I know why (4/2)t became 2t but the words "for every 2 hours that goes by, he is 4 miles farther from home," I do not grasp why this leads to (4/2)t.
 
RTCNTC said:
I understand parts of your word problem. For example, I know where D(t) comes from. I do not understand the conversion factor of 4 miles/2 hours. I know why (4/2)t became 2t but the words "for every 2 hours that goes by, he is 4 miles farther from home," I do not grasp why this leads to (4/2)t.

When something changes at a constant rate, the value of that something will be a linear function in terms of the independent variable. For example, if I pull into a gas station to fill my tank, and my tank initially has 3 gallons in it, and the pump is able to deliver fuel at a rate of 4 gallons per minute, then if time t = 0 corresponds to the moment I begin pumping gas, the amount in my tank is:

$$A(t)=4t+3$$

More generally, for different pumps capable of different delivery rates $r$ and for different initial amounts $A_0$, we could write:

$$A(t)=rt+A_0$$

Now, let's arrange this so that we solve for the rate $r$:

$$r=\frac{A(t)-A_0}{t}$$

The numerator represents the amount of fuel delivered in time $t$ (the total amount less the initial amount) and this is divided by $t$ to give the amount that the pump is able to deliver for each or per unit of time...and this is the delivery rate.

Do you now see how the pieces all fit together?
 
I am slowly able to piece it all together. Word problems are my biggest weakness in math. I feel UNWORTHY of the title MATHEMATICIAN because a math person who cannot solve word problems is just as weak as the most lost pupil.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top