How does the formula C-6 come about in the following image?

weezy
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
tann.JPG
 
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
Physics news on Phys.org
Via the principle of superposition ... where did it lose you?
C-6 is just summing up all the independent solutions already found...
 
Do you know anything about Fourier transformation and how you can use it for PDEs?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Via the principle of superposition ... where did it lose you?
C-6 is just summing up all the independent solutions already found...
I meant why does the superposition look like this? i.e. a Fourier transform?
 
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
dextercioby said:
Do you know anything about Fourier transformation and how you can use it for PDEs?
I do know about Fourier transforms but am not familiar with their relation to PDEs
 
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
weezy said:
I meant why does the superposition look like this?

A superposition of two plane waves looks like this: $$\psi(\vec r, t) = g_1 e^{i(\vec k_1 \cdot \vec r - \omega_1 t)} + g_2 e^{i(\vec k_2 \cdot \vec r - \omega_2 t)}$$
A superposition of infinitely many (but still "countable" 1,2,3...) plane waves looks like this: $$\psi(\vec r, t) = \sum_{j=0}^\infty g_j e^{i(\vec k_j \cdot \vec r - \omega_j t)}$$
Suppose the ##\omega_j## and the ##\vec k_j## can be related by ("fitted to") a continuous function ##\omega(\vec k)##. Likewise for the ##g_j## and the ##\vec k_j##, with another function ##g(\vec k)##. Then we can rewrite this slightly as $$\psi(\vec r, t) = \sum_{j=0}^\infty g(\vec k_j) e^{i(\vec k_j \cdot \vec r - \omega(\vec k_j) t)}$$
Finally, suppose we have a superposition of an "uncountably" infinite number of waves with a continuous (not discrete) distribution of values of ##\vec k##. In this case the sum becomes an integral: $$\psi(\vec r, t) = \int g(\vec k) e^{i(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega(\vec k) t)} d^3 k$$
This is a sort of "volume integral" in 3-dimensional ##\vec k##-space. The extra constant in front of your equation C-6 is basically a sort of normalization factor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top