How does the mass ratio M_W/M_Z evolve with energy?

heinz
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
The masses of the elementary particles are renormalized somewhat, when the energy (the momentum) increases. Assuming that the standard model of particle physics is correct to all energies, is there any data on how the ratio M_W/M_Z between the two vector boson masses changes with energy? Does it increase or does it decrease? Or does the question make no sense at all?

Heinz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, which (if any) parameters run depends on the choice of renormalization scheme. For processes involving direct observation of W and/or Z bosons, it's common to use an "on shell" scheme in which the particle masses do not run; see http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1075 for a review. For processes at energies well above the W and Z masses, it's easier to use modified minimal subtraction, and define the W/Z mass ratio via M_W/M_Z \equiv g_2/(g_2^2+g_1^2)^{1/2}. Then, since g_2 decreases with energy while g_1 increases, we see that M_W/M_Z decreases with energy.
 
Avodyne said:
First of all, which (if any) parameters run depends on the choice of renormalization scheme. For processes involving direct observation of W and/or Z bosons, it's common to use an "on shell" scheme in which the particle masses do not run; see http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1075 for a review. For processes at energies well above the W and Z masses, it's easier to use modified minimal subtraction, and define the W/Z mass ratio via M_W/M_Z \equiv g_2/(g_2^2+g_1^2)^{1/2}. Then, since g_2 decreases with energy while g_1 increases, we see that M_W/M_Z decreases with energy.

Thank you for the clarification, which helps me a lot. Is there a number estimate possible, say for 10^19 GeV, about how much the ratio decreases compared to low energy?

Heinz
 
Look up reviews on grand unification; these often contains plots of the running couplings at high energies. Of course, one needs to assume the particle content above the electroweak scale (eg, just the Standard Model, or additional supersymmetric particles, or ...)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top