How does the photon absorption process work in atoms?

caybo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
What is the process through which photons are absorbed/emitted from an atom?

Also... One of the threads i visited first was this:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=76246"

Post number 11, the one by Zoobyshoe explaining what Claude meant by the rope analogy using a billiard ball analogy, arises 2 questions:

1) Please explain how this works, the process through which the photon 'perturbs' the electric field without exciting the atom

2) Once the Medium is 'perturbed' and sticking to the billiard analogy, it reaches the last ball, how does it then Release the momentum of the atom that doesn't have an excited electron, and become a wave again

Of course, that must be only for if it stops becoming a wave once it perturbs the electric field. But if it does not stop being a wave while the field is perturbed, then i must misunderstand the analogy, or am missing something. Then if it maintains being a wave, even while the atom is perturbed, then how does the wave slow down? So therefore I surmise it must not be a wave during the "perturbation."

Anyone know?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The very first line of my post may be misconstrued to seem irritatingly simple. (Don't judge!)

Well, it's not. What I meant on the very first line I wrote, was quite deep, at least for my knowledge, I know a photon of a correct frequency can excite an electron- it absorbs it. How does it absorb it? What is the process through which it does this? How can we know for sure? Is it all just a commonly believed, untestable theory?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top